Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 33.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 672 Words, 4,156 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/195868/69.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 33.6 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 69

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Edward O.C. Ord, Esq. (SBN 52123) Ord & Norman 233 Sansome Street, Suite 1111 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 274-3800 Facsimile: (415) 274-3838 Attorney for Defendants Charles Hsin and Optech Limited

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES CATHCART, SCOTT CATHCART, YURIJ DEBEVC, a/k/a YURI DEBEVC, ROBERT NAGY, DERIVIUM CAPITAL (USA), INC., VERIDIA SOLUTIONS, OPTECH LIMITED, CHIHSIU HSIN, a/k/a CHARLES HSIN, FRANKLIN THOMASON Defendants. ____________________________________ STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO THE UNITED STATES' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CHARLES HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED Civil No. 07-4762-PJH

The Plaintiff and Defendants CHARLES HSIN and OPTECH LIMITED, through counsel, stipulate to extend the time to file the Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint from June 2, 2008 to June 30, 2008. The reasons for this request include: 1. Counsel for Defendants Hsin and Optech Limited has been temporarily retained to seek an extension to file the Answer but is not fully authorized to proceed in any other capacity at this time. 2. Due to the complexity of the case, counsel for Defendants Hsin and Optech Limited anticipates that more time will be needed to prepare the Answer and affirmative
STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BY DEFENDANTS CHARLES HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED

1

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 69

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3.

defenses and any necessary pre-answering motions that may need to be filed when counsel is authorized to proceed in the case. Counsel for Defendants Hsin and Optech requires more time to resolve potential conflict of interest issues and obtain written waivers if such conflict can be waived.

IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: May 30, 2008 ORD & NORMAN By /s/ Edward O.C. Ord Edward O.C. Ord Attorney for Defendants Charles Hsin and Optech Limited
T:\Clients\7118\Stip Ext Time to Answer - Hsin Optech.doc

Dated: May 30, 2008

By /s/ Allyson B. Baker Allyson B. Baker Attorney for Plaintiff The United States of America

STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BY DEFENDANTS CHARLES HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED

2

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 69

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 30, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to the following: Joseph P. Russoniello United States Attorney Thomas Moore Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division 9th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Attorney for Plaintiff HUONG T. BAILIE Special Trial Attorney 160 Spear Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Attorney for Plaintiff Farley J. Neuman ([email protected]) Tom Prountzos ([email protected]) Jenkins Goodma Neuman & Hamilton LLP 417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Attorneys for Defendant, Robert Nagy David Bujannoff Porter, Jr. ([email protected]) Wood & Porter 333 Sacramento Street San Francisco, California 94111 Attorney for Defendant Scott Cathcart I further certify that on May 30, 2008, service of the foregoing was made upon the following by depositing a copy in the Unites States mail, postage prepaid: Yuri Debevc (pro se) 1483 Burningtree Road Charleston, SC 29412 Allyson B. Baker Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 7238 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 ([email protected]) Attorney for Plaintiff

ERIC L. WEBB BARTSCH & WEBB 317 Rosecrans Avenue Manhattan Beach, California 90069 ([email protected]) Attorney for Defendant Charles Cathcart

/s/ Edward O. Ord____ EDWARD O. ORD

PROOF OF SERVICE

3