Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 46.9 kB
Pages: 4
Date: February 14, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 981 Words, 6,286 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/195980/53.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 46.9 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cr-00594-PJH

Document 53

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN STRETCH (CSBN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division DENISE MARIE BARTON (MABN 634052) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7359 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // // On January 8, 2008, the parties appeared before this Court and set dates for a Motion to Suppress and Jury Trial date. The parties agreed to the following schedule for the Motion to Suppress: Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence: Government's Opposition Filing Date: Defendant's Reply Filing Date: Hearing on Defendant's Motion: January 30, 2008 February 13, 2008 February 20, 2008 March 5, 2008, at 2:30 pm. v. JEFFREY HARRISON, Defendant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CR No. 07-0594 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND DATES FOR MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND JURY TRIAL SCHEDULES, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] - CR 07-0594 PJH

1

Case 3:07-cr-00594-PJH

Document 53

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On January 30, 2008, following submission of a Stipulation, the Court amended the briefing as follows: Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence: Government's Opposition Filing Date: Defendant's Reply Filing Date: The date for the Hearing remained the same. On February 2, 2008, counsel for the Government was injured in an accident and has been on medical leave for much of the time since that date. Counsel for the government will be working part-time on February 13-15, 2008 and February 19, 2008. However, on February 20, 2008, counsel for the government will have a knee surgery, necessitating additional estimated two weeks medical leave following the surgery. Although counsel for the government intends to return to work as soon as possible, she has been advised by her doctor that she should plan for a two-weeks absence following the surgery. Defense counsel does not oppose a short continuance to the filing date of the Government's Opposition based on AUSA Barton's current medical situation. In light of this circumstance and to afford counsel adequate time to prepare pre-trial filings and, thereafter, to prepare for the hearing and trial, the parties request the following amendments to the previously ordered schedule. For the Motion to Suppress, the parties request the following: Government's Opposition Filing Date: Defendant's Reply Filing Date: Hearing on Defendant's Motion: Evidentiary Hearing (if granted): March 7, 2008 March 21, 2008 April 9, 2008, at 2:30 pm April 16, 2008 at 2:30 pm. February 1, 2008 February 15, 2008 February 22, 2008.

With respect to the trial schedule, on January 8, 2008, the parties agreed to the following: Pre-Trial Conference: Trial: April 2, 2008 April 14, 2008.

On January 9, 2008, the Court issued an Order For Pretrial Preparation For Criminal Jury Trial setting pretrial filing dates in relation to the Pre-Trial Conference and Trial dates. For the

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] - CR 07-0594 PJH

2

Case 3:07-cr-00594-PJH

Document 53

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

reasons set forth above and, in consideration of any continuance to the Motions Hearing date, the parties request the following amendments to the previously ordered trial schedule: Pre-Trial Conference: Trial: May 7, 2008 May 19, 2008.

The parties agree that the time between February 1, 2008, the date the defendant filed the Motion to Suppress, and April 9, 2008, the date proposed for a hearing on the Motion to Suppress, is properly excluded pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 United States Code, section 3161(h)(1)(F). The parties further agree that, even in the absence of the defendant filing the Motion to Suppress, this time is properly excluded pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 United States Code, sections 3161(h)(8)(A) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) for effective preparation and continuity of counsel.

SO STIPULATED: JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney DATED: February 14, 2008 ___/s/__________________________ DENISE MARIE BARTON Assistant United States Attorney

17 18 19 DATED: February 14, 2008 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

___/s/____________________________ NANCI L. CLARENCE EDWIN K. PRATHER CRAIG H. BESSENGER Attorneys for JEFFREY HARRISON

For the foregoing reasons, the Court amends the briefing schedule and the date for a Hearing on the Motion to Suppress in the manner set forth above. The Court further amends the trial schedule as follows: Pre-Trial Conference: Trial: May 7, 2008 May 19, 2008.

The Court also vacates the Order For Pretrial Preparation For Criminal Jury Trial dated

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] - CR 07-0594 PJH

3

Case 3:07-cr-00594-PJH

Document 53

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

January 9, 2008. For the reasons stated above, the Court finds that the time between February 1, 2008, the date the defendant filed the Motion to Suppress, and April 9, 2008, the date proposed for a hearing on the Motion to Suppress, is properly excluded pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 United States Code, section 3161(h)(1)(F). The Court further finds, for the foregoing reasons, that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and failure to do so would deny government counsel continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). Accordingly, time shall be excluded from February 1, 2008 through April 9, 2008.

SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED:______________ _____________________________________ HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] - CR 07-0594 PJH

4