Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 32.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 313 Words, 2,031 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196252/15-1.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 32.7 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04978-BZ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Document 15

Filed 02/05/2008

Page 1 of 2

HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)

1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LYNN E. LOVE,
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil No. C07-04978 MMC

STIPULATION; AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES

Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of (30) days up through and including Wednesday, March 5, 2008 in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated by the number of other cases (15) Plaintiff's counsel currently has before this district court and other district courts that also require briefing around this time.
1 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Case 3:07-cv-04978-BZ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document 15

Filed 02/05/2008

Page 2 of 2

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney (verbal authorization given by Ms. Montano via telephone) Dated: February 4, 2008

/s/
DONNA M. MONTANO

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: February 4, 2008

/s/
HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff LYNN E. LOVE

IT IS SO ORDERED. Further, neither party has complied with the Court's January 4, 2008
order directing the parties to inform the Court whether they consent to a have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action; the parties are further DIRECTED to so inform the Court no later than February 15, 2008.

Dated: February 5, 2008 HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

2 STIPULATION AND ORDER