Free Order on Ex Parte Application - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04871-MEJ

Document 7

Filed 10/04/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs, UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC.; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC.; PRIORITY RECORDS LLC; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; and BMG MUSIC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; PRIORITY RECORDS LLC, a California limited liability company; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; and BMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

CASE NO. C 07-04871-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE IMMEDIATE DISCOVERY

Proposed Order Case No. C 07-04871 MEJ
#32527 v1

Case 3:07-cv-04871-MEJ

Document 7

Filed 10/04/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Upon the Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery, the Declaration of Carlos Linares, and the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is hereby: ORDERED that Plaintiffs may serve immediate discovery on University of San Francisco to obtain the identity of Defendant John Doe ("Defendant") by serving a Rule 45 subpoena that seeks documents that identify Defendant, including the name, current (and permanent) address and telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control addresses for Defendant. The disclosure of this information is consistent with University of San Francisco's obligations under 20 U.S.C. 1232g. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any information disclosed to Plaintiffs in response to the Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiffs solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiffs' rights under the Copyright Act.
UNIT ED
S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

United States District Judge
NO

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

1 Proposed Order Case No. C 07-04871 MEJ
#32527 v1

A

C

LI

FO

a James ria-Elen dge Ma Ju

R NIA

Dated: October 4, 2007 ______________

By:

ED ORDER T IS SO I _____________________________

S

RT

H