Free Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-05086-WHA

Document 15

Filed 12/19/2007

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CA STATE FOSTER PARENT ASSOCIATION, et al. Plaintiff(s), v. JOHN A. WAGNER, et al. Defendant(s). _____________________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The Parties agree to participate in private mediation, provided the mediator will handle the case on a pro bono basis. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by April 1, 2008

Case No. C 07-05086 WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Dated: December 19, 2007

___/s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis Kimberly N. Van Voorhis Attorney for Plaintiffs ___/s/ George Prince______________ George Prince, Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants

Dated: December 19, 2007

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Private ADR. Deadline for ADR Session: April 1, 2008

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________

__________________________________ The Honorable William Alsup UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

pa-1215658

-1-

Case 3:07-cv-05086-WHA

Document 15

Filed 12/19/2007

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATION BY KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, SECTION X RE: E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES 1. I am a lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of California, and a partner in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Plaintiffs. The statements herein are made on my personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify thereto. 2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatories. I declare that concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court is so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 3. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct on December 19, 2007.

By:

/s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis Kimberly N. Van Voorhis Morrison & Foerster LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs CA State Foster Parent Association, et al.

pa-1215658

-2-