Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00727-SI

Document 20

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 Court and served on opposing counsel no later than August 18, 2008, why he failed to appear at the 14 regularly scheduled case management conference, why he failed to file an amended complaint by July 15 18, 2008, and whether he intended to continue with this action. In the order, plaintiff was advised that 16 in the event an adequate response was not provided by August 18, 2008, this action might be dismissed 17 without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 18 Plaintiff did not file any response to the Order to Show Cause, nor did he contact the Court in 19 any way concerning the action. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to 20 prosecute. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: August 21, 2008 24 25 26 27 28 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, Defendant. / LIEM HIEU LE, Plaintiff, No. C 08-727 SI ORDER DISMISSING ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

By order dated August 1, 2008, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, in writing filed with the

Case 3:08-cv-00727-SI

Document 20-2

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 1 of 1