Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00727-SI

Document 17

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 1, 2008. Defendant was present through counsel, but plaintiff did not appear, nor did plaintiff contact 14 the Court in any way concerning his absence. Further, by order dated July 9, 2008, plaintiff's complaint 15 was dismissed with leave to amend by July 18, 2008. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, nor 16 did he contact the Court in any way concerning an extension of that deadline. 17 Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause, in writing filed with the Court and served on 18 opposing counsel no later than August 18, 2008, why he failed to appear; why he failed to file an 19 amended complaint by July 18, 2008; and whether he intends to continue with this action 20 In the event an adequate response is not provided by August 18, 2008, this action may be 21 dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil 22 Procedure. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: August 1, 2008 25 26 27 28 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, Defendant. / LIEM HIEU LE, Plaintiff, No. C 08-727 SI ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

This matter came on for a regularly-scheduled case management conference on Friday, August

Case 3:08-cv-00727-SI

Document 17-2

Filed 08/01/2008

Page 1 of 1