Free Certificate of Service - District Court of California - California


File Size: 102.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 21, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 664 Words, 4,131 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/200519/26.pdf

Download Certificate of Service - District Court of California ( 102.5 kB)


Preview Certificate of Service - District Court of California
Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW

Document 26

Filed 02/21/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 Henry C. Su (SBN 211202; [email protected]) Katharine L. Altemus (SBN 227080; [email protected]) 2 HOWREY LLP 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor 3 East Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 798-3500 4 Facsimile: (650) 798-3600 5 Robert Ruyak Matthew Wolf 6 Marc Cohn HOWREY LLP 7 1229 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 8 Telephone: (202) 783-0800 Facsimile: (202) 383-6610 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORPORATION and HOLOGIC LP 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. C08 00133 RMW PROOF OF SERVICE

14 HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORPORATION, and HOLOGIC LP, 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 SENORX, INC., 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
HOWREY LLP

Proof of Service Case No. C08 00133

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW

Document 26

Filed 02/21/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and 3 not a party to the within action. My business address is 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor, East Palo Alto, California 94303. 4 On February 21, 2008, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: 5 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 6 THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (CONFIDENTIAL VERSION and PUBLIC VERSION); DECLARATION OF KATHARINE L. 7 ALTEMUS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR 8 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; DECLARATION OF GLENN MAGNUSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 9 THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (CONFIDENTIAL and PUBLIC VERSION); ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER 10 SEAL CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSTIION TO DEFENDANT'S MOPTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR 11 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PORTIONS OF THE SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF GLENN MAGNUSON PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(C); DECLARATION 12 OF KATHARINE L. ALTEMUS IN SUPPORT OF CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(C) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS TO FILE UNDER SEAL CONFIDENTIAL 13 PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOITION FOR PRELIMINARY 14 INJUNCTION AND PORTIONS OF THE SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF GLENN MAGNUSON; [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 15 UNDER SEAL CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON POLAINTIFF'S 16 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PORTIONS OF THE SYUPPORTING DECLARATION OF GLENN MAGNUSON; and PROOF OF SERVICE 17 by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below and causing such envelope(s) to be deposited in the U.S. Mail at East Palo Alto, California. 18 19 F.T. Alexandra Mahaney Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 20 12235 El Camino Real, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92130-3002 21 E-Mail: [email protected] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 X X Aaron P. Maurer (E-Mail: [email protected]) Adam D. Harber (E-Mail: [email protected]) Bruce R. Genderson (E-Mail: [email protected]) Williams & Connolly, LLP 725 ­ 12th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005

(MAIL) I am readily familiar with this firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. (EMAIL/ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed above. I did not receive, within a reasonable time
-1-

Proof of Service Case No. C08 00133

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW

Document 26

Filed 02/21/2008

Page 3 of 3