Free Notice (Other) - District Court of California - California


File Size: 95.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 21, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 346 Words, 2,127 Characters
Page Size: 627.987 x 808.841 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/203051/3.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of California ( 95.1 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of California
Case 4:08-cv-02313-WDB

Document 3

Filed 05/05/2008

Page 1 of 2

-----4,1 wi8l~bWlP~i;~OR!>'6AATro~5 117 SOUTH BEVERLY DRIVE
BEVERLY HILLS). CALIFORNIA 90212
6 IPi~ 310-S50-870v
--._H.~~'~~:' ").J31wO::.:z.,,g43.-247 1 . ....-.... ~ "_._,,, .. ' .
o.
0 ยท

I
REYANI D. LAP1Qdus1,,(B..ar N9._I).9~8~ 8) mal: nranta1:1212.1 us aW.com 2
DA..1\TJEL C.'LA"PIDUS (Bar No. 227170) Email: danuula.Qidus1aw.com . 3
JIM D. BAUCH (Bar No. 199454)

.

7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs V-Haul Co. of Califomia 8 and Amerco Real Estate Company
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA'

10

11
12

13
14

15
16

OAKLAND DMSION . U-HAULCO.OECALIFORNIA,a . CASE NO,: California corporation; an~ AMERCO REAL ESTATE COMPANY, a Nevada PLAlNTlFFS'NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTION corporation; OR PROCEEDING (LOCAL RULE 3-13) . . Plaintiffs,

C08-02313'

VS. 17 18 CITY OF BERKELEY, a municipality;

. 19

Defendant.

20
21

22
23

24 25

26
27

28
PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTION OR PROCEEDING (LOCAL RULE 3.13)
. -1 .

Case 4:08-cv-02313-WDB

Document 3

Filed 05/05/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-13, Plaintiffs U-Haul Co. of California ("U

2
Haul") and Amerco Real Estate Company ("Amerco") hereby inform the Court
3
that there is an action pending in the Superior Court for the County of Alameda,

4
Case No. RG07352204 (the "State Court Action") between PlaintiffU-Haul Co. 5
of California ("U-Haul") and Defendant City of Berkeley.
6
The State Court Action was initiated by U-Haul's petition for writ of

7
mandate challenging certain actions of the City of Berkeley. Judgment was
8
entered on February 7, 2008. 9
Plaintiffs do not believe that any coordination of proceedings is necessary

10
between this action and the State Court Action. 11
12
DATED: May 2, 2008 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
LAPIDUS & LAPIDUS A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

f1)t<

DANIEL C. LAPI S Attorneys for Plai iff U-Haul Co. of California and Amerco Real Estate Company

22

23
24
25


26

27
28


PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTION OR PROCEEDING (LOCAL RULE 3-13)
-2