Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California - California


File Size: 21.6 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 18, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 633 Words, 4,046 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/204235/16.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California ( 21.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP

Document 16

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JEFFREY G. KNOWLES (State Bar No. 129754) CONOR P. MOORE (State Bar No. 230079) COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111-4213 Telephone: 415.391.4800 Facsimile: 415.989.1663 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LINDA K. RYBKOSKI, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTERMUNE, INC., W. SCOTT HARKONEN, AND GENENTECH, INC.,

Case No. CV-08-2916 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Trial Date: Not Set

Defendants.

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Complaint in this action was filed on June 11, 2008; WHEREAS, Defendant Genentech, Inc. intends to file a motion to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety; WHEREAS, on June 30, 2008 Plaintiff moved to relate this case to a civil action currently pending before the Hon. Marilyn J. Patel of this Court, Deborah Jane Jarrett, et al. v. InterMune, Inc., et al., 3:08-cv-02376-MHP ("Jarrett"); WHEREAS, Judge Patel has extended Defendants' time to respond in Jarrett until August 25, 2008;
13403.001.916458v1

1

Case No. CV-08-2916

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP

Document 16

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs in the Jarrett action and Defendants have agreed to request that the Court in Jarrett extend the time in which Defendants shall have to respond to the Complaint in Jarrett to September 22, 2008; NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate and request that the time in which Defendants shall have to respond to the Complaint filed herein be extended to and including September 22, 2008.

DATED: July 18, 2008

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

By: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: DATED: July 18, 2008 By: DATED: July 18, 2008 By: DATED: July 18, 2008

/s/ Jeffrey G. Knowles Jeffrey G. Knowles Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

WEXLER TORISEVA WALLACE LLP

/s/ Jennifer Fountain Connolly Jennifer Fountain Connolly Attorneys for Plaintiff LINDA K. RYBKOSKI

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP /s/ William M. Goodman William M. Goodman Attorneys for Defendant W. SCOTT HARKONEN

COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP

/s/ Simon J. Frankel Simon J. Frankel Attorneys for Defendant INTERMUNE, INC.

[Proposed] ORDER
13403.001.916458v1

2

Case No. CV-08-2916

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP

Document 16

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Court

13403.001.916458v1

3

Case No. CV-08-2916

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP

Document 16

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: July 18, 2008

ATTESTATION I, Jeffrey G. Knowles, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defendant Genentech, Inc. to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Jennifer Fountain Connolly, William M. Goodman and Simon J. Frankel have concurred in this filing.

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

By:

/s/ Jeffrey G. Knowles Jeffrey G. Knowles Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

13403.001.916458v1

4

Case No. CV-08-2916

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT