Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California - California


File Size: 19.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: July 15, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 537 Words, 3,454 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/204235/14.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California ( 19.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP

Document 14

Filed 07/15/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JEFFREY G. KNOWLES (State Bar No. 129754) Email: [email protected] COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111-4213 Telephone: 415.391.4800 Facsimile: 415.989.1663 Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LINDA K. RYBKOSKI, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTERMUNE, INC., W. SCOTT HARKONEN, AND GENENTECH, INC.,

Case No. CV-08-2916 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GENENTECH, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Trial Date: None

Defendants.

Plaintiff and Defendant Genentech, Inc. by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Complaint in this action was filed on June 11, 2008; WHEREAS, Defendant Genentech, Inc. intends to file a motion to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety: WHEREAS, on June 30, 2008 Plaintiff moved to relate this case to a civil action currently pending before the Hon. Marilyn J. Patel of this Court, Deborah Jane Jarrett, et al. v. InterMune, Inc., et al., 3:08-cv-02376-MHP ("Jarrett"); WHEREAS, Judge Patel has extended Defendants' time to respond in Jarrett until August 25, 2008;

10149.004.913919v1

1

Case No. CV-08-2916

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GENENTECH, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP

Document 14

Filed 07/15/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, the answers of Genentech's Co-Defendants in this case, W. Scott Harkonen and InterMune, Inc., are not due until August 22, 2008 and August 25, 2008, respectively; NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant Genentech, Inc. hereby stipulate that the time in which Defendant Genentech, Inc. shall have to respond to the Complaint filed herein shall be, and hereby is, extended to and including August 25, 2008.

DATED: July 15, 2008 COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

By:

/s/ Jeffrey G. Knowles Jeffrey G. Knowles Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

DATED: July 15, 2008 WEXLER TORISEVA WALLACE LLP

By:

/s/ Jennifer Fountain Connolly Jennifer Fountain Connolly Attorneys for Plaintiff LINDA K. RYBKOSKI

[Proposed] ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Court

10149.004.913919v1

2

Case No. CV-08-2916

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GENENTECH, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP

Document 14

Filed 07/15/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTESTATION I, Jeffrey G. Knowles, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defendant Genentech, Inc. to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Jennifer Fountain Connolly has concurred in this filing.

DATED: July 15, 2008

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

By:

/s/ Jeffrey G. Knowles Jeffrey G. Knowles Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

10149.004.913919v1

3

Case No. CV-08-2916

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GENENTECH, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT