Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 33.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 597 Words, 3,878 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8551/519.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware ( 33.9 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 519

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY Neither of the two cases cited by Defendants is relevant to this case. Muniauction involved the simple adaptation of a single prior art system for use with a known web browser, where the patentee's expert had conceded the system contained every claimed limitation other than a web browser. Comcast involved a single dependent claim which depended from a claim the Federal Circuit had already determined to be anticipated. Neither of these fact patterns approximates the facts of this case,1 which SRI respectfully suggests warrant a trial. Case No. 04-1199

1

The apparent basis for citing these cases is their ultimate conclusion that certain claims were obvious. Of course, for every post-KSR case Defendants can cite where a patent claim was invalidated as obvious, SRI could cite a case to the contrary. See, e.g., Ortho-McNeil Pharma. Inc. v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 520 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (aff'g summary judgment of nonobviousness and issuance of permanent injunction); Forest Labs. v. Ivax Pharma., 501 F.3d 1263 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (aff'g determination of non-obviousness made after a bench trial in Delaware District Court and issuance of permanent injunction).

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 519

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 2 of 3

Dated: July 24, 2008

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Thomas L. Halkowski Thomas L. Halkowski (#4099) Kyle Wagner Compton (#4693) 919 N. Market Street, Suite 1100 P.O. Box 1114 Wilmington, DE 19889-1114 Tel: (302) 652-5070 Fax: (302) 652-0607 Frank E. Scherkenbach 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel: (617) 542-5070 Fax: (617) 542-8906 Howard G. Pollack Katherine D. Prescott 500 Arguello St., Ste. 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Tel: (650) 839-5070 Fax: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Plaintiff SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

2

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 519

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 24, 2008, I electronically filed with the Clerk of Court the attached RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing(s) to the following Delaware counsel. In addition, the filing will also be sent via hand delivery: Richard L. Horwitz David E. Moore Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP Hercules Plaza 1313 North Market Street, 6th Floor P.O. Box 951 Wilmington, DE 19899 [email protected] [email protected] Richard K. Herrmann Morris James Hitchens & Williams LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, 15th Floor P.O. Box 2306 Wilmington, DE 19899-2306 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Georgia corporation

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Symantec Corporation

I also certify that on July 24, 2008, I electronically mailed the above document(s) to the following non-registered participants: Paul S. Grewal Renee DuBord Brown Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 [email protected] [email protected] Holmes J. Hawkins, III Natasha H. Moffitt King & Spalding LLP 1180 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Symantec Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Georgia corporation /s/ Thomas L. Halkowski Thomas L. Halkowski