Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 60.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: May 20, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 536 Words, 3,220 Characters
Page Size: 612.24 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8551/512-1.pdf

Download Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware ( 60.6 kB)


Preview Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 512

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 512

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 2 of 3

Richard K. Herrmann 302.888.6816 [email protected]

May 13, 2008 FILED UNDER SEAL VIA E-FILING AND HAND DELIVERY The Honorable Sue L. Robinson United States District Court District of Delaware 844 King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Re: SRI International v. ISS and Symantec, D. Del., C.A. No. 04-1199-SLR Your Honor: Symantec submits this letter in response to the Court's request at the April 29, 2008 status conference that the parties submit copies of those portions of the record pertaining to the two summary judgment issues that the Court has agreed to rule upon.1 The documents identified below and attached as exhibits to this letter concern Defendants' position that the EMERALD 1997 reference in combination with its internally-cited reference Intrusive Activity 1991 rendered obvious all of the asserted claims of the `203 and `615 patents. ISS will submit a separate letter concerning its position that the asserted claims of the `338 patent were anticipated by the JiNao reference. The combination of EMERALD 1997 and Intrusive Activity 1991 was originally addressed in the Joint Motion of Defendants ISS and Symantec for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. ยงยง 102 & 103 (D.I. 297), which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Relevant portions of Defendants' opening brief in support of their motion (D.I. 299) are attached as Exhibit B. Relevant portions of Defendants' reply brief in support of their motion (D.I. 400) are attached as Exhibit C. The documents cited in those two briefs were previously submitted as exhibits to the Declaration of Renee DuBord Brown (D.I. 301) and the Declaration of Geoffrey M. Godfrey (D.I. 402). The relevant portions of those declarations are attached as Exhibits D and E, respectively.2

1 2

See 4/28/2008 Hearing Tr. (Docket Item ("D.I. 499")) at 28-32.

Defendants have not attached copies of documents that were cited only in the background section of their opening brief (D.I. 299 at 6-10).

500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 | Wilmington, DE 19801-1494 T 302.888.6800 F 302.571.1750 Mailing Address P.O. Box 2306 | Wilmington, DE 19899-2306 www.morrisjames.com

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR The Honorable Sue L. Robinson May 13, 2008 Page 2

Document 512

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 3 of 3

The combination of EMERALD 1997 and Intrusive Activity 1991 was also addressed in Symantec's April 25, 2008 letter to the Court (D.I. 500), and during the April 29, 2008 status conference (D.I. 499 at 6-12). Symantec does not understand the Court to have requested copies of those most recent parts of the record, but we would be pleased to provide copies if that would be of assistance to the Court. Symantec continues to appreciate the Court's attention to these matters. Respectfully, /s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann, I.D. No. 405 [email protected] RKH/tp cc: Dr. Peter T. Dalleo, Clerk of the Court (via hand delivery) John Horvath, Esq. (via email) Howard G. Pollack, Esq. (via email) Richard L. Horwitz, Esq. (via email) David Moore, Esq. (via email) Holmes Hawkins, III, Esq. (via email)