Free Motion for Joinder - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 19.0 kB
Pages: 5
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 873 Words, 5,725 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8583/129-4.pdf

Download Motion for Joinder - District Court of Delaware ( 19.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Joinder - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129-4

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 1 of 5

EXHIBIT 3

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129-4

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 2 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ____________________________________ FRESHLOC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ) and VERSUS TECHNOLOGY, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) RADIANSE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

Civil Action No. 04-1231 (SLR)

AMENDED COMPLAINT (REDLINED VERSION) Plaintiff Versus Technology, Inc., for its Complaint against Defendant Radianse, Inc., alleges as follows: Nature of the Action 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of

the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. Identification of the Parties 2. Plaintiff Versus Technology, Inc. ("Versus") is a corporation incorporated

under the laws of Delaware. It has its principal place of business at 2600 Miller Creek Road, Traverse City, Michigan 49684. 3. Radianse, Inc., ("Radianse") is a Delaware Corporation with its principal

place of business at 439 South Union Street, Suite 403, Lawrence, Massachusetts 01843. 4. Plaintiff, FreshLoc Technologies, Inc. ("FreshLoc") is a Texas

Corporation with its principal place of business at 15443 Knoll Trail, Suite #100, Dallas, Texas 75248-3453.

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129-4

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 3 of 5

Jurisdiction and Venue 5. [4.] Jurisdiction is proper in the United States District Court pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1338(a). Venue is proper in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(b) and (c) and §1400(b). General Background 6. [5.] Versus is a leading developer and marketer of products using infrared (IR)

and radio frequency (RF) technology for, inter alia, the healthcare industry. Versus's primary products are passive infrared locating systems with radio frequency supervision, passive data collection systems, asset locating systems, portal detection systems and location event processing software. 7. [6.] Radianse markets and sells an Indoor Positioning System (IPS) product,

known as the Radianse Indoor Positioning Solution (the "Radianse IPS product"), for the healthcare environment which combines radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) transmissions with receivers to present real-time location data. Count I ­ Patent Infringement ­ Radianse IPS 8. [7.] herein. 9. [8.] On June 25, 1991, United States Patent 5,027,314 entitled "Apparatus and Versus incorporates paragraphs 1 to 7 [6] by reference as if fully set forth

Method for Position Reporting" (the "314 Patent") was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the 314 Patent is attached as Exhibit A to the original Complaint (D.I. 1). 10. [9.] On November 5, 1996, United States Patent 5,572,195 entitled "Sensory

and Control System for Local Area Networks" (the "195 patent") was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the 195 Patent is attached as Exhibit B to the original Complaint (D.I. 1).

2

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129-4

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 4 of 5

11. [10.] On July 25, 2000, United States Reissue Patent 36,791 entitled "Location System Adapted For Use In Multipath Environments" (the "791 patent") was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the 791 Patent is attached as Exhibit C to the original Complaint (D.I. 1). 12. [11.] On November 28, 2000, United States Patent 6,154,139 entitled "Method and System for Locating Subjects within a Tracking Environment" (the "139 patent") was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the 139 Patent is attached as Exhibit D to the original Complaint (D.I. 1). 13. [12.] Versus is the owner of the 314 and 139 Patents. 14. [13.] FreshLoc is the owner of the 195 and 791 Patents. Versus is the exclusive licensee of the 195 and 791 Patents, with the right to bring suit thereon. 15. [14.] Radianse has infringed at least one claim of each of the 314, 195, 791 and 139 Patents by, at least, directly making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell its Radianse IPS product, and/or inducing or contributing to the infringement of the Patent claims. 16. [15.] Upon information and belief, the aforesaid infringement by Radianse has been willful. 17. [16.] Versus has been damaged by the infringement, and will continue to suffer irreparable harm and damage as a result of this infringement, unless such infringement is enjoined by the Court. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Versus prays for the following relief: (a) Entry of preliminary and permanent injunctions against Radianse's

continued infringement of the 314, 195, 791, and 139 Patents by making, using, selling or offering for sale the Radianse IPS product; an accounting for damages in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty, such damages to be trebled pursuant to 35 USC § 284; an assessment of interest costs and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to 35 USC § 285; 3

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129-4

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 5 of 5

(b) (c)

Trial by jury on all issues so triable; and Such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate, including

an award of prejudgment interest, costs, and attorney fees. This the 19th day of January, 2006.

s/ James M. Lennon George Pazuniak (DE #478) James M. Lennon (DE #4570) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP The Nemours Building 1007 North Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19899 Telephone: 302-658-9141 Facsimile: 302-658-5614 Attorneys for Plaintiff Versus Technologies, Inc.

4