Free Motion for Joinder - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 18.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 691 Words, 4,340 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8583/129-1.pdf

Download Motion for Joinder - District Court of Delaware ( 18.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Joinder - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ VERSUS TECHNOLOGY, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) RADIANSE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)

Civil Action No. 04-1231 (SLR)

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO JOIN A NECESSARY PARTY In light of new precedent from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ("Federal Circuit"), Plaintiff Versus Technology, Inc. ("Versus") hereby moves the Court to join as a plaintiff, FreshLoc Technologies, Inc. (FreshLoc). FreshLoc is the owner and licensor of two of the four patents asserted by Versus against Defendant Radianse, Inc. ("Radianse") in this suit, U.S. Patent No. 5,572,195 (D.I. 1, Ex. B) and U.S. Patent Reissue No. 36,791 (D.I. 1, Ex. C). FreshLoc granted an exclusive license to Versus for a period that is less than the full term of the licensed patents. The recent Federal Circuit decision in Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Miracle Optics, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2006 WL 44185 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 10, 2006) (Exhibit 1 hereto), clarifies the previously unsettled question of law regarding whether an exclusive patent licensee for less than the full-term of the patent can maintain an infringement suit on the patent without joining the patent owner. The Federal Circuit determined that the patent owner must be joined. In light of this recent decision, and pursuant to Rules 15(a), 17(a), 19(a), 20(a) and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Versus seeks to amend its initial and only Complaint in this matter (D.I. 1) to join FreshLoc as a party plaintiff to this action.

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 2 of 3

FreshLoc's president, Alan C. Heller, has agreed to accept service of the summons and amended complaint on behalf of Freshloc. Joinder of Feshloc will not prejudice any party and should provide no cause for a delay of this litigation. Mr. Heller, also the primary inventor for the two patents licensed to Versus, has already provided documents and has been deposed pursuant to a subpoena by Radianse. Should the Court allow the Complaint (D.I. 1) to be amended to join Freshloc as a party, Radianse's Motion to Dismiss Based upon Lack of Standing (D.I. 78) will be moot. Radianse opposes this motion, despite Versus efforts to reach agreement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1. Pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, duplicate copies of the proposed Amended

Complaint are attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2, copies of the patents in suit attached as Exhibits A-D to the original Complaint (D.I. 1) are incorporated herein by reference. Further pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, a redline version showing the changes from Versus's initial Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. In light of the above, Versus respectfully requests that the Court grant Versus leave to file an amended complaint to join FreshLoc as a party plaintiff. Respectfully submitted, CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ, LLP DATED: January 19, 2006 /s/ James M. Lennon George Pazuniak (#478) James M. Lennon (#4570) The Nemours Building 1007 North Orange Street P.O. Box 2207 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-9141 Attorneys for Plaintiff Versus Technology, Inc.

2

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 129

Filed 01/19/2006

Page 3 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 19, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing documents with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, and served copies of the same on this date the following individuals in the manner indicated: By Hand, CM/ECF Notification and E-mail: Josy W. Ingersoll (#1088) [email protected] John W. Shaw (#3362) [email protected] YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR LLP The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor Wilmington, DE 19899-0391 (302) 571-6600 Counsel for defendant, Radianse, Inc. By E-mail: Sibley P. Reppert [email protected] LAHIVE & COCKFIELD 28 State Street Boston, MA 02109-1784 (617) 227-7400 Co-Counsel for defendant, Radianse, Inc.

/s/ James M. Lennon George Pazuniak (#478) James M. Lennon (#4570) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ, LLP 1007 North Orange Street P.O. Box 2207 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-9141 DATED: January 19, 2006 Attorneys for Plaintiff Versus Technology, Inc.

3