Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02156-L-AJB

Document 8

Filed 12/04/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PULSE-LINK INCORPORATED, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 TZERO TECHNOLOGIES, 14 INCORPORATED, 15 16 17 On December 3, 2007 the parties filed a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 07cv2156-L(AJB) ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18 to Complaint. To obtain an extension of time to respond to complaint, the moving party must 19 show good cause. Civ. L. Rule 12.1. The parties base their request on recent substitution of 20 counsel for Defendant. The court's docket at this time does not include any application for 21 substitution of counsel. Accordingly, the joint motion for extension of time to respond to 22 complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Should the parties renew their request, they 23 shall include the initial due date for Defendant's response. 24 25 26 DATED: December 4, 2007 27 28 M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge
07c2156

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 3:07-cv-02156-L-AJB

Document 8

Filed 12/04/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 COPY TO: 2 HON. ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
07c2156