Free Motion to Continue - District Court of California - California


File Size: 32.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 19, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 349 Words, 2,276 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/258777/21-2.pdf

Download Motion to Continue - District Court of California ( 32.7 kB)


Preview Motion to Continue - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02221-BEN-NLS

Document 21-2

Filed 05/19/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6

HERMEZ MORENO, ESQ., SBN 72009 FRANK PEREZ, ESQ., SBN 205377 RICHARD T. COPELAND, ESQ., SBN 213605 MORENO & PEREZ A Professional Law Corporation 714 West Olympic Blvd., Suite 450 Los Angeles, CA 90015 Tel: (213) 745-6300 Fax:(213) 745-6060

Judy Perez, Esq., SBN 223019 LAW OFFICES OF JUDY PEREZ 7 453 S. Spring Street, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90013 8 Tel: (213) 622-3330 Fax: (213) 622-3335
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY

Attorneys for Plaintiff: HENRY KODIMER, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, LYN RAMSKILL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY KODIMER, by and through ) through his guardian ad litem, ) LYN RAMSKILL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) CITY OF ESCONDIDO, COUNTY ) OF SAN DIEGO, OFFICER WYSE, ) OFFICER UMSTOT, SERGEANT ) DISTEL, AND DOE DEFENDANTS 1) THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) _______________________________ ) CASE NO.: 07CV2221 BEN (NLS) [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PARTIES' JOINT MOTION/ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES AND TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO'S 12(b)(6) MOTION

Case 3:07-cv-02221-BEN-NLS

Document 21-2

Filed 05/19/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS: Having read and considered the Parties' Joint Motion/Stipulation to Continue Dates and Stay Discovery Pending the County of San Diego's 12(b)(6) Motion the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. That the date for the Rule 26 conference be continued to ________________; That discovery in this matter be stayed pending the decision on the County's 12(b)(6) motion; That the May 19, 2008 date for filing of a discovery plan be vacated and reset for _____________________; That the May 23, 2008 initial disclosure date be vacated, and be reset for _____________________; and That the May 30, 2008 telephonic conference be vacated, and be reset for ____________________________.

Dated: _______________

________________________________ United States District Court Judge

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY