Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02209-L-WMC

Document 4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 07cv2209-L (WMC) CASE TITLE: Nunez v. Microsoft Corporation, et al. E-FILED DATE: 12/7/2007 DOCKET NO.: 3 DOCUMENT TITLE: Stipulation and (proposed) Order Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint DOCUMENT FILED BY: Defendants Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

X

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g)

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: Document is signed by someone other than the registered user filing the document.

X

ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1

X

ECF (2)(f)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: December 10, 2007 X

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge