Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02231-RJB

Document 41

Filed 08/25/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 JAMES J. MITTERMILLER, Cal. Bar No. 85177 [email protected] 2 FRANK J. POLEK, Cal. Bar No. 167852 [email protected] 3 JOHN C. DINEEN, Cal. Bar No. 222095 [email protected] 4 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 5 Including Professional Corporations 501 West Broadway, 19th Floor 6 San Diego, California 92101-3598 Telephone: 619-338-6500 7 Facsimile: 619-234-3815 8 Attorneys for Defendants SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and SPRINT 9 SPECTRUM L.P. 10 11 12 13 14 UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK and ERIC TAYLOR, on 15 behalf of themselves, their members and/or all others similarly situated, as applicable, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.; and SPRINT 19 SPECTRUM L.P., 20 21 22 Plaintiffs Utility Consumers' Ac tion Network and Eric Taylor ("Plaintiffs"), Defendants. Case No. 07 CV 2231 RJB PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case Assigned To: Hon. Robert J. Bryan UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

23 on the one hand, and Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum L.P. 24 ("Defendants"), on the other hand, hereby stipulate, agree and jointly move as follows: 25 26 1. On August 15, 2008, the Court entered its Order on Responses to

27 Order to Show Cause and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Strike (the 28 "Order"); and -1W02-WEST:8JCD1\401003644.1

PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:07-cv-02231-RJB

Document 41

Filed 08/25/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

2.

In the Order, the Court decided the remaining issues still pending in

2 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Second Amended Compl aint and also decided 3 certain issues pertaining to the Court's jurisdiction. The Court also set Friday, August 29, 4 2009 at 9:30 a.m. for a Status and Scheduling Conference. 5 6 Due to the number of issues present in the case and the complexities of those

7 issues, Plaintiffs and Defendants agree and jointly move for an order that Defendants shall 8 have up to and including Monday, September 8, 2008 to file an answer to Plaintiffs' 9 Second Amended Complaint. This extension of time does not affect the Status and 10 Scheduling Conference set for Friday, August 29, 2008. 11 12 Dated: August 25, 2008 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2W02-WEST:8JCD1\401003644.1

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By s/James J. Mittermiller Attorneys for Defendants SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. E-mail: [email protected]

Dated: August 25, 2008 ROSNER & MANSFIELD, LLP By s/John W. Hanson Attorneys for Plaintiffs UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK and ERIC TAYLOR E-mail: [email protected]

PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT