Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02294-L-BLM

Document 41

Filed 07/08/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 07cv2294-L (BLM) CASE TITLE: Anticancer Inc. V. Teco, Inc., et al. E-FILED DATE: 7/3/2008 DOCKET NO.: 40 DOCUMENT TITLE: Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment DOCUMENT FILED BY: Defendants Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) X ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 or Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 X Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 X

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature - Declarations electronically signed by someone other than the filer. Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing tables of contents to exhibits Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: Exhibits are not filed with the declaration they belong to which makes attachments difficult to view. Additionally the memo of points and authorities is filed twice - as the main document and as an attachment.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. X The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: July 8, 2008 M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge