Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California


File Size: 17.0 kB
Pages: 1
Date: June 20, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 353 Words, 2,189 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/259645/37.pdf

Download Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California ( 17.0 kB)


Preview Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02294-L-BLM

Document 37

Filed 06/20/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 07cv2294-L (BLM) CASE TITLE: Anticancer Inc. V. Teco, Inc., et al. E-FILED DATE: 6/18/2008 DOCKET NO.: 35 DOCUMENT TITLE: Defendants' Request for Relief and Reply DOCUMENT FILED BY: Defendants Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) X ECF § 2(a), (g)

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed - two separate events required. Motion and reply ­ you may not file the reply unless and until the Court grants your ex parte motion for leave to file a late reply Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature - Declaration electronically signed by someone other than the filer. Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER:

ECF § 2(g) X ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 X Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 or Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: June 20, 2008 M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge X