Free Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Subject Jurisdiction - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 35.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 269 Words, 1,805 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8620/35-2.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Subject Jurisdiction - District Court of Delaware ( 35.3 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Subject Jurisdiction - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv—O1 268-***—M PT Document 35-2 Filed O3/O2/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DTSTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re: ) Chapter II
)
THE TT GROUP, INC , et al ) Case No 02—IOTTS (MTW)
Debtors, ) Jointiy Administered
—————————--~»~»----~»»—»—-·— I
IT LITIGATION TRUST, )
Piaintiff, ) Civ A No 04-CV—I268 (RAI)
I
" i
DANIEL A. D’ANIELLO, ERANCISJ )
HARVEY, JAMES C. McGHJL, )
RICHARD W. POGUE, PHILLIP E )
DOLAN, E MARTIN GIBSON, ROBERT )
F. PUGLIESE, CHARLES W SCHMIDT, )
JAMES DAVID WATIQINS, ANTHONY )
I DeLUCA, HARRY I SOOSE, THE )
CARLYLE GROUP, THE CARLYLE )
GROUP, L L C , CARLYLE PARTNERS ) IURY TRIAL DEMANDED
II, L P , CARLYLE SBC PARTNERS, I1, )
L P , CARLYLE INTERNATIONAL )
PARTNERS II, LP , CARLYLE )
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS III, C/S )
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS, )
CARLYLE INVESTMENT GROUP, L.P , )
CARLYLEJT INTERNATIONAL )
PARTNERS, L.P,, CARLYLE-IT )
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS II, L P , )
CARLYLEJT PARTNERS LP., and TC. )
GROUP, L L C , )
Defendants )
ORDER OF COURT
Defendents’ Joint Motion to Dismiss for Lack. of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
having been filed, and ali parties having had en opportunity to be heard, end the Court having
given due consideration to the perties’ arguments,
IT IS hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED tht Def`endants’
Joint Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is GRANTED;

Case 1:04-cv—O1268—***—MPT Document 35-2 Filed O3/O2/2005 Page 2 of 2
IT IS further ORDERED that Counts I through V and IX of the above-
referenced matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice
Dated: ,2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ec; All counsel of record
2