Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of California - California


File Size: 80.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 728 Words, 4,597 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/264773/9-1.pdf

Download Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of California ( 80.9 kB)


Preview Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00397-H-AJB

Document 9

Filed 03/17/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Stuart E. Jones, (State Bar No 104566) WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM 44 Montgomery Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, California 94104-4705 Telephone: (415) 391-7111 Telefax: (415) 391-8766 Attorneys for Defendant Kim Logue, an individual doing business as About Attitude

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIPPYS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ABOUT ATTITUDE, an entity of unknown form, 13817 Village Mill Drive, Suite 200, Midlothian, Virginia; KIM LOGUE, an individual, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant.

Case No.: 08-CV-0397 H OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Date: Time: Dept: Judge: March 24, 2008 10:00 a.m. 13 Marilyn L. Huff

Defendant Kim Logue objects to the evidence submitted in support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction on each of the following grounds: Declaration of Robert "Bob" Kipperman 1. Paragraphs 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23: Mr. Kipperman lacks personal

knowledge of the statements contained therein. FRE 104; United States v Burnett (DC Cir. 1989) 890 F2d 1233, 1240 2. Paragraphs 20, 21, 22 and 23 12 and 13: Mr. Kipperman lacks both the personal

knowledge and requisite experience to give an opinion regarding Ms. Logue's actions. FRE 702; Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) 509 US 579, 592

OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 3:08-cv-00397-H-AJB

Document 9

Filed 03/17/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: March 17, 2008 3.

Declaration of Raphael Emanuel Paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: The statements contained in these paragraphs are

hearsay. FRE 801(a) and (c); Superior Fireplace Co. v Majestic Products Co. (Fed Cir. 2001) 270 F3d 1358, 1365-1366; Web postings are "statements" subject to the hearsay rule. United States v Jackson (7th Cir. 2000) 208 F 3d 633, 637 4. Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H: The statements contained in these exhibits are

hearsay. FRE 801(a) and (c); Superior Fireplace Co. v Majestic Products Co. (Fed Cir. 2001) 270 F3d 1358, 1365-1366; Web postings are "statements" subject to the hearsay rule. United States v Jackson (7th Cir. 2000) 208 F 3d 633, 637. 5. Paragraph 12 and 13: Mr. Emanuel lacks personal knowledge of the statements

contained therein. He cannot have personal knowledge of Kippys good faith belief or state of mind. FRE 104; United States v Burnett (DC Cir. 1989) 890 F2d 1233, 1240 6. Paragraph 12 and 13: Mr. Emanuel lacks both the personal knowledge and

requisite experience to give an opinion regarding Ms. Logue's actions. FRE 702; Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) 509 US 579, 592

Respectfully submitted,

WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM By: /s/ Stuart E. Jones Stuart E. Jones Wright, Robinson, Osthimer & Tatum 44 Montgomery St., 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 391-7111, Fax (415) 391-8766 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Kim Logue, an individual doing business as About Attitude

OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 3:08-cv-00397-H-AJB

Document 9

Filed 03/17/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF FILING

I hereby certify that on March 17, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF system which will send a notification of electronic filing to the following CM/ECF Participants and served upon all counsel of record by placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, and sent to their last known address as follows: Joseph A. Yanny, Esq. Raphael B. Emanuel, Esq. Kim D. Ashley, Esq. Yanny & Smith 1801 Century Park East, 23rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 551-2966 Facsimile: (310) 551-1949 Attorneys for Plaintiff Kippys, Inc.

By: /s/ Stuart E. Jones Stuart Jones Wright, Robinson, Osthimer & Tatum 44 Montgomery St., 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 391-7111, Fax (415) 391-8766 [email protected]

OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION