Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 16.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 6, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 327 Words, 1,984 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/264773/7.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 16.8 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00397-H-AJB

Document 7

Filed 03/06/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KIPPYS, INC., a California corporation, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 08-CV-0397 H (AJB) SCHEDULING ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

ABOUT ATTITUDE, an entity of unknown form, 13817 Village Mill Drive, Suite 200, Midlothian, Virginia 23114; KIM LOGUE, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. On March 3, 2008, plaintiff Kippys, Inc., a California corporation, filed a complaint against defendants About Attitude and Kim Logue. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff filed concurrently an ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") and for an order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction. (Doc. No. 3.) The Court declines to grant ex parte injunctive relief and orders as follows: 1. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with copies of the complaint, Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a TRO, and all other documents filed by Plaintiff in this case. Plaintiff also shall serve defendants with a copy of this Order. 2. The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiff's motion for a TRO on March 24, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. in courtroom 13.

-1-

08cv329

Case 3:08-cv-00397-H-AJB

Document 7

Filed 03/06/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3.

Defendants shall file responses in opposition to Plaintiff's motion for a

TRO by March 17, 2008. If Defendants wish to specially appear for the limited purpose of opposing Plaintiff's motion for a TRO, Defendants should so indicate on their briefs. 4. Plaintiff may file a reply on or before March 20, 2008. The Court orders both parties to preserve all relevant evidence until the hearing on Plaintiff's motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 6, 2008 MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

08cv329