Free Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-01338-JJF Document 582 Filed O9/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. )
and HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL )
PROPERTIES INC., )
) C.A. N0. 04-I 338 (KAJ)
Plaintiffs, )
) CONSOLIDATED
v. )
)
APPLE COMPUTER, INC., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
DISCOVERY ORDER
Whereas, upon Plaintiffs’ request, the Court conducted a telephone conference on
September I4, 2006 in the above-referenced matter to discuss the schedule f`or the Defendants`
production of documents to Plaintiffs and the Defendants’ supplementation of certain responses
to P|aintiffs` interrogatories;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
I. Deadlines for initiation and substantial completion of document production.
Individual Defendants will initiate and substantially complete document production based
on the following schedule:
Defendant Deadline for Initiation of Deadline for Substantial
Document Production Completion of Document
Production
Arima Display October I0, 2006 October 30, 2006
Casio Computer Co., Ltd. N/A October 30, 2006
BOE—HYDIS Technology Co., N/A October 30, 2006
Ltd.
Fuii Defendants September 30, 2006 October 30, 2006
Hitachi Displays, Ltd. N/A October 30, 2006
Philips Defendants N/A October 30, 2006
Samsung SDI Defendants N/A October 30, 2006

Case 1:O4—cv—O1338-JJF Document 582 Filed O9/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
Defendant Deadline for Initiation of Deadline for Substantial
Document Production Completion of Document
Production
Sony N/A October 30, 2006
Seiko Epson Corp. and Sanyo September 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 l
Epson Imaging Devices
Toppoly Optoelectronics N/A October 30, 2006 `
Corp.
Wintek Defendants September 30, 2006 October 30, 2006
2. Deadlines for providing supplemental responses to contention interrogatories
that are independent of information provided by Honeywell and on which Defendants bear
the burden of proof
individual Defendants will, subject to further supplementation, provide supplemental
responses to P|aintiffs’ contention interrogatories that are independent of information provided
by Honeywell on which Defendants bear the burden ofproof based on the following deadlines:
Defendant Deadline for providing supplemental
responses to contention interrogatories on
laches and invalidi .
Arima Display October 6, 2006
Casio Com titer Co., Ltd. September 28, 2006
Citizen Defendants Se tember 30, 2006
Hitachi Displays, Ltd. September 22, 2006
Philips Defendants October l3, 2006 l
Seiko Epson Corp. and Sanyo Epson lmaging September 30, 2006
Devices
Toppoly Optoelectronics Corp. October 6, 2006
Wintek Defendants October 6, 2006
SO ORDERED: rn “ `
U ited States istr`ct Cou Judge
_,.-1 /
i lv lf; M
Dated: ”` 7
szsszi
2