Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF

Document 581-2

Filed 09/26/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE COMPUTER, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 04-1338 (KAJ) CONSOLIDATED

DISCOVERY ORDER Whereas, upon Plaintiffs' request, the Court conducted a telephone conference on September 14, 2006 in the above-referenced matter to discuss the schedule for the Defendants' production of documents to Plaintiffs and the Defendants' supplementation of certain responses to Plaintiffs' interrogatories; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Deadlines for initiation and substantial completion of document production.

Individual Defendants will initiate and substantially complete document production based on the following schedule: Defendant Deadline for Initiation of Document Production October 10, 2006 N/A N/A September 30, 2006 N/A N/A N/A Deadline for Substantial Completion of Document Production October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006

Arima Display Casio Computer Co., Ltd. BOE-HYDIS Technology Co., Ltd. Fuji Defendants Hitachi Displays, Ltd. Philips Defendants Samsung SDI Defendants

Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF

Document 581-2

Filed 09/26/2006

Page 2 of 2

Defendant

Deadline for Initiation of Document Production N/A September 30, 2006 N/A September 30, 2006

Sony Seiko Epson Corp. and Sanyo Epson Imaging Devices Toppoly Optoelectronics Corp. Wintek Defendants

Deadline for Substantial Completion of Document Production October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006 October 30, 2006

2. Deadlines for providing supplemental responses to contention interrogatories that are independent of information provided by Honeywell and on which Defendants bear the burden of proof. Individual Defendants will, subject to further supplementation, provide supplemental responses to Plaintiffs' contention interrogatories that are independent of information provided by Honeywell on which Defendants bear the burden of proof based on the following deadlines: Defendant Deadline for providing supplemental responses to contention interrogatories on laches and invalidity. October 6, 2006 September 28, 2006 September 30, 2006 September 22, 2006 October 13, 2006 September 30, 2006 October 6, 2006 October 6, 2006

Arima Display Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Citizen Defendants Hitachi Displays, Ltd. Philips Defendants Seiko Epson Corp. and Sanyo Epson Imaging Devices Toppoly Optoelectronics Corp. Wintek Defendants

SO ORDERED:

____________________________________ United States District Court Judge

Dated:________________
538631

2