Free Transfer Document - District Court of California - California


File Size: 25.3 kB
Pages: 6
Date: September 9, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,255 Words, 8,100 Characters
Page Size: 595 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/276916/4.pdf

Download Transfer Document - District Court of California ( 25.3 kB)


Preview Transfer Document - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-01493-JM-BLM
1 2 3 4

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 ----ooOoo---- 7 8 9 NUTRISHARE, INC., 10 11 12 BIORX, LLC, 13 14 15 16 17 18 ----ooOoo---- This action has been assigned to the undersigned judge. Defendant(s). / Plaintiff(s), V. NO. 2:08-CV-01252-WBS-EFB ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

19 Pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, 20 IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. A Status (pretrial scheduling) Conference is set for

22 September 22, 2008 at 02:00 PM, before the undersigned judge 23 in Courtroom No. 5. At least twenty-one (21) calendar days before

24 the scheduling conference is held, the parties shall confer and 25 attempt to agree upon a discovery plan, as required by, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 26(f). 27 ///

1

Case 3:08-cv-01493-JM-BLM
1

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 2 of 4

2. Pursuant to Local Rule 16-240, the parties shall

2 submit to the court a JOINT Status Report fourteen (14) 3 calendar days prior to the hearing date, which shall contain: 4 5 (a) brief summary of the claims; (b) a statement as to the status of service upon all

6 defendants and cross-defendants; 7 (c) a statement as to the possible joinder of additional

8 parties; 9 10 11 (d) any contemplated amendments to the pleadings; (e) the statutory basis of jurisdiction and venue; (f) a written report outlining the proposed discovery

12 plan required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). 13 (g) a proposed cut-off date by which all discovery shall

14 be concluded; 15 (h) a proposed date by which all motions shall be filed

16 and heard; 17 (i) any proposed modification of standard pretrial

18 proceedings due to the special nature of the action; 19 20 (j) the estimated length of trial; (k) a statement as to whether the case is related to any

21 other case, including any matters in bankruptcy; 22 (l) any other matters discussed in Local Rule 16-240 that

23 may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter. 24 3. Concurrently with the service of process, or as soon

25 thereafter as possible, plaintiff shall serve upon each of the 26 parties named in the complaint, and upon all parties subsequently 27 joined, a copy of this order, and shall file with the clerk a 28 certificate reflecting such service.

2

Case 3:08-cv-01493-JM-BLM
1

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 3 of 4

4. In the event this action was originally filed in a

2 state court and was thereafter removed to this court, the removing 3 party or parties shall immediately following such removal, serve 4 upon each of the other parties and upon all parties subsequently 5 joined a copy of this order, and shall file with the clerk a 6 certificate reflecting such service. 7 5. All parties to the action shall appear by counsel (or A FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE

8 in person if acting without counsel).

9 APPROPRIATE TIME WILL BE TREATED AS A FAILURE TO APPEAR AND MAY 10 SUBJECT COUNSEL TO SANCTIONS. 11 6. In order to assist the court in meeting its recusal

12 responsibilities, any non-governmental corporate party to this 13 action shall submit a statement identifying all its parent and 14 subsidiary corporations and listing any publicly held company that owns 15 10% or more the party's stock. Such statement shall be included in

16 the parties' Joint Status Report. If any non-governmental corporate 17 party has no parent or subsidiary corporations or no publicy held 18 companies owning 10% or more of its stock, it shall so state in the 19 Joint States Report. Failure to comply with the foregoing 20 requirements of this paragraph will result in the Joint Status 21 Report being stricken and such other sanctions as may be appropriate. 22 Thereafter, if there is any change in the information, the party 23 shall file and serve a supplemental statement within a reasonable time 24 after such change occurs. 25 7. In appropriate cases, and after receiving the

26 parties' joint status report, the court may issue a Status 27 (Pretrial Scheduling) Order without requiring a status conference. 28 Unless the parties have received such an order prior to the status

3

Case 3:08-cv-01493-JM-BLM

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 conference, the parties are required to attend the status 2 conference as scheduled. 3 4 5 by: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 /s/ L. Mena-Sanchez Deputy Clerk DATE: June 5, 2008 WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01493-JM-BLM

Document 4-2

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NUTRISHARE, INC.,
Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s),

Case No. 2:08-CV-01252-WBS-EFB ORDER RE CONSENT

vs. BIORX, LLC,
Defendant(s)/Respondents(s).

OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT

This case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Without the written consent of the parties presently appearing pursuant to 28 U.S.C Sec. 636(c), a magistrate judge cannot conduct all proceedings and enter judgment in this case with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the event an appeal is filed. If a party declines to consent and the case is assigned to a district judge, the assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties as required by Eastern District Local Rule 72-302. Accordingly, within 30 days, the parties shall complete and return this form to the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/5/08 /s/ - Edmund F. Brennan United States Magistrate Judge

IMPORTANT: You must check and sign only one section of this form and return it to the Clerk's Office within 30 days. The complaint/petition will not be reviewed by the court until plaintiff/petitioner has signed and returned this form. Note: This form must be completed and returned regardless of the choice exercised by any other party.

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The undersigned hereby voluntarily consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case.

Date: ___________________

Signature: _______________________________ Print Name: ______________________________ ( ) Plaintiff/Petitioner ( ) Defendant/Respondent ( ) Counsel for *

DECLINE OF JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The undersigned declines to consent to the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to this case and requests random assignment to a United States District Judge. Date: ___________________ Signature: _______________________________ Print Name: ______________________________ ( ) Plaintiff/Petitioner ( ) Defendant/Respondent ( ) Counsel for *

*If counsel of record, list name of each party responding: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case 3:08-cv-01493-JM-BLM

Document 4-3

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 1 of 1

TO: Mail Stop 8 Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been filed in the U.S. District Court Eastern California on the following
DOCKET NO.
CIV. 2:08-CV-01252-WBS-EFB

Patents or

Trademarks:

DATE FILED 6/5/08

US District Court Eastern California Sacramento DEFENDANT

PLAINTIFF

NUTRISHARE, INC.,

BIORX, LLC,

PATENT OR TRADEMARK NO. 1 2,615,200 2 3 4 5

DATE OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK September 03, 2002

HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

Nutrishare

In the above-entitled case the following patents(s) have been included:
DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY Amendment PATENT OR TRADEMARK NO. 1 2 3 4 5 DATE OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK Answer Cross Bill Other Pleadings

HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

In the above-entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgment issued:
DECISION/JUDGMENT

CLERK

(BY) DEPUTY CLERK

DATE