Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 65.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 14, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 309 Words, 1,917 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8690/996-1.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 65.7 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF

)LVK

5LFKDUGVRQ SF

Document 996

Filed 04/14/2008

Page 1 of 1
6XLWH 1 0DUNHW 6WUHHW SR %R[ :LOPLQJWRQ 'HODZDUH 7HOHSKRQH

! % $ %! ¤9¤ 8"¤ ¤§¤5¢© ¨310 )( 7 6 ¥¡4 2

FB"9CTRS @ C @

¢#Is8pbr#tVsA F U AI DI

¤ ¤#"¤ '& % $!! ¢© ¤¦§¦¤¢ ¨ ¨¡£ ¥£¡

April 14, 2008 VIA ECF The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. United States District Court for the District of Delaware 844 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Re:

)DFVLPLOH :HE 6LWH ZZZIUFRP 7KRPDV / +DONRZVNL (PDLO KDONRZVNL#IUFRP

a
§A3DB"BAB@ @ @ C U X @ @ C TBWVB"¢U3S §9T¢rGQp8I9#"F d U C C @ q D b CI bGavwRQBpa8uHFT`V S D A i DI c @ f X Q d TR¢eV§aD U Q i U S D @ R§#I3hBgF D Q A Q RBHFGBP DI A E 8BHFGB@ c bI D E T8aR`Y

Honeywell International Inc., et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al. USDC-D. Del. - C.A. No. 04-1338 KAJ (Consolidated)

Dear Judge Farnan: Per Your Honor's instructions at the April 2, 2008, status conference in this matter, enclosed please find a proposed order addressing the licensing issue regarding certain customer defendants. After exchanging a number of drafts amongst the parties, the Plaintiffs and Apple reached agreement upon the proposed order this afternoon. Please be advised, however, that given the large number of defendants and the difficulty in coordinating a group response, not all of the relevant entities have yet expressed their agreement with the language of the proposed order.1 Respectfully, /s/ Thomas L. Halkowski Thomas L. Halkowski TLH:sb Enclosure cc Clerk of Court (via hand) Counsel of Record (via ECF)

To date, Audiovox Communications, Dell, Eastman Kodak, Hartford Computer, Navman, Olympus Corp. & Olympus America Inc., Pentax (now Hoya), Sony, Sony Ericcson Mobile Communications AB & Sony Ericcson Mobile Communications USA Inc. have all concurred with the proposed order, and no defendant has objected to it.

1