Free Memorandum and Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 49.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 8, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 292 Words, 1,873 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8723/362.pdf

Download Memorandum and Order - District Court of Delaware ( 49.8 kB)


Preview Memorandum and Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:O4—cv—O1371-JJF Document 362 Filed O9/08/2006 Page1 of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., a :
Delaware corporation, :
Plaintiff, E
v. E C.A. No. 04—l37l—JJF
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR E
INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware :
corporation, and FAIRCHILD :
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a :
Delaware corporation, :
Defendants. E
MEMORANDUM ORDER
By letter (D I. 336) dated August 24, 2006, Plaintiff
requests clarification and reconsideration of the Court’s August
22 Order (D I. 330) granting Defendants Motion To Compel Power
Integrations To Provide “Pared Down" Infringement Contentions For
Trial. Specifically, Plaintiff requests the Court to allow Power
Integrations to select a total of seven (7) claims and four (4)
groups of accused products for trial, rather than the one claim
per patent and three groups of products ordered by the Court.
Defendants have not filed a response to Plaintiff’s letter.
The Court has reviewed the circumstances as it relates to this
issue and concludes that Plaintiff’s request is reasonable.
Accordingly, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s request for
reconsideration.

Case 1:04—cv—01371-JJF Document 362 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
l. Plaintiff’s letter request (D.I. 336) for
reconsideration is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff shall select a total of seven (7) claims and
four (4) groupings of accused products to assert at trial and
shall identify the asserted claims and accused products and
groupings to Defendants by close of business (4:30 p.m. EST) on
Monday, September 18, 2006, so that the parties can make any
adjustments to the Pretrial submissions that may be necessary in
light of this ruling.
September 8, 2006 %L .
Date UN ED TATE DISTRICT JUDG
2