Free Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 80.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: September 2, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 510 Words, 3,106 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8723/355.pdf

Download Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware ( 80.0 kB)


Preview Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 355 Filed O9/O2/2006 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) C.A. No. 04-1371-JJF
)
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR )
INTERNATIONAL, INC., and FAIRCHILD )
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, )
)
Defendants. )
DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
(ON INVALIDITY)
Defendants hereby respectfully submit their proposed special verdict form on the issue of
invalidity in the above action.
ASHBY & GEDDES
/s/ Steven J Balick
Steven J. Balick (I.D. #2114)
Jolm G. Day (I.D. #2403)
Tiffany Geyer Lydon (I.D. #3950)
222 Delaware Avenue, 17th Floor
P.O. Box 1 150
Wilmington, DE 19899
302-654-1888
Attorneys for Dekndcmts
Of Counsel:
G. Hopkins Guy, III
Vickie L. Feeman
Bas de Blank
Brian H. VanderZanden
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 614-7400
Dated: September 1, 2006

Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 355 Filed O9/O2/2006 Page 2 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., )
Plaintiff, g
v. g C.A. N0. O4-1371-JJF
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR g
INTERNATIONAL, INC., and FAIRCHILD )
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, )
Defendants. g
DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
(ON INVALIDITY)
We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:
1. Do you fmd that Claim 5 of the ‘075 Patent is invalid? (A "YES” answer to this
question is a finding for Fairchild. A “NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES _ NO _
2. Do you find that Claim I of the ‘876 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this
question is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO” answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES _ NO _
3. Do you find that Claim I of the ‘85 1 Patent is invalid? (A "YES” answer to this
question is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES _ NO _
4. Do you find that Claim I4 of the ‘366 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this
question is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES _ NO i

Case 1:O4—cv—O1371-JJF Document 355 Filed O9/O2/2006 Page 3 0f 4
You must each sign this Verdict Form: Dated:
(foreperson)
172729.1

Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 355 Filed O9/O2/2006 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 2"d day of September, 2006, the attached DEFENDANT’S
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM (ON INVALIDITY) was served upon the below—named counsel
of record at the address and in the manner indicated:
William J . Marsden, Jr., Esquire VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Fish & Richardson, P.C.
919 N. Market Street
Suite 1100
Wilmington, DE 19801
Frank E. Scherkenbach, Esquire VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Fish & Richardson P.C.
225 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110-2804
Michael Kane, Esquire VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Fish & Richardson P.C.
60 South Sixth Street
3300 Dain Rauscher Plaza
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Howard G. Pollack, Esquire VLA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Fish & Richardson P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
/s/ Steven J Balick
Steven J. Balick