Free MEMORANDUM in Support - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 44.1 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 899 Words, 5,332 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8737/29.pdf

Download MEMORANDUM in Support - District Court of Delaware ( 44.1 kB)


Preview MEMORANDUM in Support - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01385-GMS

Document 29

Filed 08/07/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Jack Wolf, Plaintiff, v. Thomas Carroll, DCC Medical Dept., C/O Pusey, C/O Carter, and Lt. Seacord, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C. A. No. 04-1385-GMS

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF FULL FILING FEES AND FOR RELATED RELIEF Plaintiff is an inmate in the custody of the Delaware Department of Correction at the Delaware Correctional Center near Smyrna, Delaware. The instant case is merely one in a series of frivolous legal actions which he has filed. Defendants Carter, Pusey and Seacord submit that plaintiff's history of abusing the judicial process brings him within the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g), the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and that he must therefore immediately pay the full fees normally due upon commencement of a case in this Court.

I.

FACTS

Plaintiff is an incessant but consistently unsuccessful pro se litigant. In addition to the instant civil rights action, he has filed at least six unsuccessful civil actions in federal court which have been found to fail as a matter of law. On November 22, 2004, this Court granted Wolf's application to proceed in forma pauperis. Wolf v. Carroll, et al, C.A. No. 04-1385-GMS. Notwithstanding Wolf's IFP status, he has filed at least three civil actions in the past, while incarcerated, that were dismissed as frivolous, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief

Case 1:04-cv-01385-GMS

Document 29

Filed 08/07/2006

Page 2 of 4

may be granted. Wolf v. Laferty, et al., C.A. No. 00-374-JJF; Wolf v. Funk, C.A. No. 00-427JJF; Wolf v. Windslow, et al.., C.A. No. 00-428-JJF; Wolf v. County Police, C.A. No. 00429-JJF; Wolf v. Williams, et al.., C.A. No. 00-433-JJF; Wolf v. Gander Hill Prison, C.A. No. 00-618-JJF are prior cases dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted. Therefore, collectively they count towards the "three strike rule" to prevent Wolf from filing another civil action in forma pauperis while incarcerated unless he demonstrates that he is in "imminent danger." The Defendants urge that Wolf's complaint does not meet the "imminent danger" exception to § 1915 (g). On November 22, 2004, this Court, presumably being unaware of the plaintiff's litigation history, granted him permission to pursue this case in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915 ("§1915(g)"). II. LAW AND ARGUMENT

The "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, §1915(g), provides that "in no event" shall a prisoner be permitted to proceed under §1915 if he has pursued three or more actions or appeals in federal courts which were dismissed on grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Section 1915(g) is mandatory and Mr. Wolf clearly falls within its terms. Mr. Wolf exceeds the statutory criteria and hence has "struck out." Essentially, this Court has determined that the civil action cases listed above count toward the "three strikes" rule when it dismissed the cases as frivolous or malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, there can be no question as to §1915(g)'s applicability to the case at bar. Moreover, Wolf did not demonstrate that at the time he filed the complaint he was in imminent danger. See Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307 (3d Cir.2001). Because Wolf, who is covered by § 1915 (g), brought this case without prepaying all

Case 1:04-cv-01385-GMS

Document 29

Filed 08/07/2006

Page 3 of 4

appropriate fees, the case must be dismissed. Payment of all fees, or a proper grant of in forma pauperis status, is a precondition to litigation. Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 858 (7th Cir. 1999).

WHEREFORE, defendants Carter, Pusey and Seacord submit that Mr. Wolf should be compelled to pay in full immediately all fees due upon commencing a case in this Court or face dismissal. STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ___/s/ Ophelia M. Waters___________ Ophelia M. Waters, Bar I.D. No. 3879 Deputy Attorney General 820 North French Street, 6th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 577-8400 Counsel for Defendants Carter, Pusey and Seacord

Dated: August 7, 2006

Case 1:04-cv-01385-GMS

Document 29

Filed 08/07/2006

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING AND/OR DELIVERY The undersigned certifies that on August 7, 2006, she caused the attached Defendants' Motion to Compel Payment of Filing Fees/Vacate IFP Order and Memorandum in Support of the Motion to be delivered to the following person(s) in the form and manner indicated:

NAME AND ADDRESS OF RECIPIENT(S): Inmate Jack W. Wolf S.B.I. No. 00093532 Delaware Correctional Center 1181 Paddock Road Smyrna, Delaware 19977 MANNER OF DELIVERY: One true copy by facsimile transmission to each recipient X Two true copies by first class mail, postage prepaid, to each recipient. Two true copies by Federal Express Two true copies by hand delivery to each recipient.

/s/ Ophelia M. Waters______ Ophelia M. Waters, ID# 3879 Deputy Attorney General Carvel State Office Building 820 N. French Street, 6th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8400 Attorney for Defendants Carte, Pusey and Seacord