Free Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 8.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 353 Words, 2,135 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/20756/45.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction - District Court of Colorado ( 8.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:03-cv-02453-ZLW-DME

Document 45

Filed 06/21/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 03-cv-2453-ZLW-CBS KEITH LANCE, CARL MILLER, RENEE NELSON, NANCY O' CONNOR, Plaintiffs, v. DONETTA DAVIDSON, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO, in her Official Capacity only, Defendant.

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIM

On June 20, 2005, this matter came before a three-judge panel, Judges David M. Ebel, John C. Porfilio, and Zita L. Weinshienk, for a hearing on Defendant Donetta Davidson' Motion To Dismiss. The Court heard the arguments and statements of s counsel, and made oral conclusions of law which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Donetta Davidson' Motion To Dismiss is granted in s part and denied in part. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is granted as to Plaintiffs' First Claim for Relief based upon the Elections Clause, and the First Claim is dismissed with prejudice. It is

Case 1:03-cv-02453-ZLW-DME

Document 45

Filed 06/21/2005

Page 2 of 2

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is denied as to Plaintiffs' Second Claim for Relief based on an individual right to petition claim under the First and Fourteenth Amendments insofar as the motion is limited to the issues of Rooker-Feldman and issue preclusion. It is FURTHER ORDERED that an opinion supporting the above rulings will be provided by the Court in due course. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court accepts Defendant' oral motion under s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Second Claim as a matter of law. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before July 11, 2005, the parties shall file simultaneous briefs, not to exceed 15 pages, on Defendant' oral motion to dismiss. s Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 21st day of June, 2005. BY THE COURT:

s/Zita L. Weinshienk ____________________________ ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court DAVID M. EBEL, Judge United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit JOHN C. PORFILIO, Senior Judge United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

2