Free Proposed Jury Instructions - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 44.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 15, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 736 Words, 4,589 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/23819/1096-28.pdf

Download Proposed Jury Instructions - District Court of Colorado ( 44.5 kB)


Preview Proposed Jury Instructions - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cr-00103-REB-MEH

Document 1096-28

Filed 03/30/2007

Page 1 of 3

INSTRUCTION NO. G-27 MONEY LAUNDERING 18 U.S.C. § 1957 The following defendants are charged with money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1957 as described in the chart below: Count 34 Date March 23, 2000 Defendant(s) NORMAN SCHMIDT Monetary Transaction Clearing of check #1012 in the amount of $20,000 on Reserve Foundation, LLC account at Bank One payable to America West Packaging $24,273.75 wire transfer from Smitty's account at Wells Fargo Bank account to Asset Holdings account at US Bank Clearing of check #1412 in the amount of $20,000 on Smitty's account at Wells Fargo Bank payable to Miloka Holdings Clearing of check #1428 in the amount of $35,000 on Smitty's account at Wells Fargo Bank, payable to Team Walker Motorsports Clearing of check #1460 in the amount of $50,000 on Smitty's account at Wells Fargo Bank, payable to Jannice McLain $219,703.41 wire transfer from Capital Holdings, LLC account at Wells Fargo Bank to Northwest Group, LLC account at US Bank Clearing of check #1037 in the amount of $55,000 from Capital Holdings, LLC account at Wells Fargo Bank, payable to Charles Lewis $25,000 wire transfer from Smitty's account at Wells Fargo Bank to Federal Recovery Group account at North Fork Bank

36

June 18, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT; MICHAEL SMITH

37

July 23, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT; CHARLES LEWIS

38

August 5, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT

39

August 7, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT

40

August 15, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT; MICHAEL SMITH

41

August 15, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT; CHARLES LEWIS

42

October 1, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT

Case 1:04-cr-00103-REB-MEH

Document 1096-28

Filed 03/30/2007

Page 2 of 3

43

November 18, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT; GEORGE ALAN WEED NORMAN SCHMIDT

Clearing of check #1621 in the amount of $130,000 on Smitty's account at Wells Fargo Bank, payable to Compliance Holding Co. $7,500,000 wire transfer from Capital Holdings, LLC account at Wells Fargo Bank to First Clearing Corp. account at First Union Bank Clearing of check #1735 in the amount of $65,000 on Smitty's account at Wells Fargo Bank payable to Concrete Building Systems Clearing of check #1008 in the amount of $92,632.60 on Fast Track, LLC, account at Key Bank payable to Compliance Holding Co. Withdrawal of $13,516.41 from Rocky Mountain Sports Promotions, LLC account at Commercial Federal Bank

44

December 12, 2002

45

December 30, 2002

NORMAN SCHMIDT

46

February 24, 2003

GEORGE ALAN WEED

47

May 2, 2003

NORMAN SCHMIDT

This law makes it a crime knowingly to engage in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property of a value greater than $10,000 and which is derived from specified unlawful activity. To find the defendant whose case you are considering guilty of this crime, you must be convinced that the government has proved each of the following beyond a reasonable doubt: First: the defendant engaged or attempted to engage; Second: in a monetary transaction; Third: in criminally derived property; Fourth: knowing that the property is derived from unlawful activity, namely mail fraud, wire fraud, or securities fraud; and Fifth: the property is, in fact, derived from specified unlawful activity, namely mail fraud, wire fraud, or securities fraud. 2

Case 1:04-cr-00103-REB-MEH

Document 1096-28

Filed 03/30/2007

Page 3 of 3

The term "criminally derived property" means any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained from a criminal offense. "Proceeds" can be any kind of property, not just money. You are not required to find that the defendant whose case you are considering knew that the unlawful activity was "specified unlawful activity," only that the defendant knew that the activity was unlawful. The term "conducts" includes initiating, concluding, or participating in initiating, or concluding a transaction. The term "monetary transaction" means the deposit, withdrawal, transfer, or exchange, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce as defined in instruction number ____, or funds or a monetary instrument, by, through, or to a financial institution. "Interstate commerce" means commerce or travel between the states, territories or possessions of the United States, including the District of Columbia. It is not necessary that the defendant have intended or anticipated an effect on interstate commerce. All that is necessary is that the natural and probable consequence of the acts the defendant took would be to affect interstate commerce.

United States v. Dazey, 403 F.3d 1147, 1163 (10th Cir. 2005); 18 U.S.C. § 1957. 3