Free Response to Motion - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 14.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 8, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 405 Words, 2,572 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25424/112.pdf

Download Response to Motion - District Court of Colorado ( 14.4 kB)


Preview Response to Motion - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-01006-RPM

Document 112

Filed 11/08/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 04-M-1006 (RPM) SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III, L.P., SPECIAL SITUATIONS CAYMAN FUND, L.P., SPECIAL SITUATIONS TECHNOLOGY FUND NEW, L.P. AND SPECIAL SITUATIONS TECHNOLOGY FUND II, L.P. on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. QUOVADX, INC., LORINE R. SWEENEY, GARY T. SCHERPING, JEFFREY M. KRAUSS, FRED L. BROWN, J. ANDREW COWHERD, JAMES B. HOOVER, CHARLES J. ROESSLEIN and JAMES A. GILBERT Defendants.

DEFENDANTS QUOVADX, INC., JEFFREY M. KRAUSS, FRED L. BROWN, J. ANDREW COWHERD, JAMES B. HOOVER, CHARLES J. ROESSLEIN and JAMES A. GILBERT'S STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

Case 1:04-cv-01006-RPM

Document 112

Filed 11/08/2005

Page 2 of 2

Defendants Quovadx, Inc., Jeffrey M. Krauss, Fred L. Brown, J. Andrew Cowherd, James B. Hoover, Charles J. Roesslein and James A. Gilbert (collectively, the "Quovadx Defendants") hereby state that they do not oppose the motion of Lead Plaintiffs Special Situation Fund III, L.P., Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P., Special Situations Technology Fund New, L.P. and Special Situations Technology Fund II, L.P., for Class Certification, filed on October 27, 2005. The Quovadx Defendants make this statement of non-opposition based upon their review of the papers submitted by Lead Plaintiffs in support of their motion, as well as upon the Quovadx Defendants' review of the voluminous record compiled in connection with the contested motion for appointment as lead plaintiffs, including the briefs filed on behalf of Plaintiffs' in connection with that motion, the Declarations of Lawrence Rolnick and Austin Marxe in support of that motion, and the transcript of the deposition of Austin Marxe taken in connection with that motion. The Quovadx Defendants' statement of non-opposition to Lead Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is not, and should not be construed as, a waiver of the Quovadx Defendants' right to take further discovery from Lead Plaintiffs regarding the merits of the litigation. Respectfully submitted by, Dated: November 8, 2005 s/ John P. Stigi III John P. Stigi III Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati One Market Street, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 San Francisco, California 94105 Tel: (415) 947-2000 Fax: (415) 947-2099 Attorneys for Defendant Quovadx, Inc., Jeffrey M. Krauss, Fred L. Brown, J. Andrew Cowherd, James B. Hoover, Charles J. Roesslein and James A. Gilbert

-1-