Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 16.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 4, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 254 Words, 1,664 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25478/50-2.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado ( 16.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-00560-OES-BNB

Document 50-2

Filed 10/04/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 04-cv-00560-OES-BNB

GEORGE M. BULL, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS

Pursuant to the Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pre-Trial Motions, and good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for filing pre-trial motions is now Monday, October 17, 2005. DATED THIS _____ day of _____________________, 2005. BY THE COURT:

____________________________ Magistrate Judge O. Edward Schlatter

1

Case 1:04-cv-00560-OES-BNB

Document 50-2

Filed 10/04/2005

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this _______ day of October, 2005, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following e-mail addresses: Donald C. Sinclair, II SINCLAIR KELLY JACKSON REINHART & HAYDEN 501 Corporate Drive Suite 200 Canonsburg, PA 15317 Mark C. Hansen Union Pacific Railroad Company 1331 17th Street, Suite 406 Denver, CO 80202 Sabina Y. Chung, Esq. Jack D. Robinson, Esq. SPIES, POWERS & ROBINSON, P.C. 1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 2220 Denver, CO 80264 Fredric A. Bremseth, Esq. Thomas W. Geng, Esq. BREMSETH LAW FIRM 810 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

I certify that there are no non CM/ECF participants in this case.

_______________________ _______

2