Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:04-cv-00617-LTB-BNB

Document 66

Filed 09/06/2005

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 04-cv-617-LTB-BNB POLYROCK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL STEEL DOMESTIC SALES, LLC, et al., Defendants.

P A N IFSUNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND L I TF ' TO: ( D MA E TSMOTION TO DISMISS I E R S' ) ( ) E E A S E LS G N T N ' A DK I H ' MO I NT S R K I G N R L T E ', E S O ES N N G TS I TO O T I E

Plaintiff PolyRock Technologies, LLC moves for an extension of time, to and including Sp m e 920,n h h o epn t df dn ' ed g o oso i i ad o tk. et br ,04i w i t r od o e nat pni m t n t d m s n t si e c s e s n i s s re As grounds, PolyRock states: 1. RULE 7.1A CERTIFICATION: Pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1A, the

undersigned conferred with counsel for defendants General Steel, Genstone, Knight and Demarest concerning this motion. Counsel confirmed that defendant Demarest does not object to the requested extension of time to respond to his motion to dismiss and defendants General Steel, Genstone and Knight do not object to the requested extension of time to respond to their motion to strike. 2. Demarest filed his motion to dismiss on August 11, 2005. DCC l L i 7 C P l oksepnes u o Sp m e6 ..o .Cv . , o R c'r os ide n et br . o R 1 y s e Pursuant to

Case 1:04-cv-00617-LTB-BNB

Document 66

Filed 09/06/2005

Page 2 of 3

3. Defendants General Steel, Genstone and Knight filed their renewed motion to strike o A gs1.P r atot C ut Mi t O dr a dA gs1, o R c' r pne s n uut 7 us n t h ors n e re dt uut 8 P l oks e os i u e ' u e y s due on September 7 and the reply is due on September 21. 4. Due to travel schedules and the Labor Day holiday, representatives of PolyRock have nt a a opr n y ocm et ncusl da s fh r pne t t pni m t n. o hd n pot i t o m n o one s r to t e osso h ed g o os ut ' f e s e n i PolyRock requests an extension of time, to and including Friday September 9, in which to respond to the pending motions. 5. Assuming the requested extensions are granted, counsel agree that corresponding extensions of the deadlines to submit reply briefs, to and including September 27 (15 days per D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1C plus three days for service), are also appropriate. 6. A proposed order is attached as Tab 1. DATED: September 6, 2005 Respectfully submitted

s/ John A. DeSisto John A. DeSisto W. Curtis Graves FEATHERSTONE DESISTO LLP 600 17th Street, Suite 2400 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: (303) 626-7100 Facsimile: (303) 626-7101 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff PolyRock Technologies, LLC

2

Case 1:04-cv-00617-LTB-BNB

Document 66

Filed 09/06/2005

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 6, 2005, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following e-mail addresses: Susan M. Hargleroad Pendleton, Friedberg, Wilson & Hennessey, P.C. [email protected] Kurt S. Lewis Lewis Scheid LLC [email protected] and I hereby certify that I have mailed or served the same on the following non-CM/ECF participant by placing same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid addressed to: Christopher M. Reim, Managing Director PolyRock Technologies, LLC 4949 S. Syracuse Street, Suite 340 Denver, CO 80237

s/ John A. DeSisto

3