Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 78.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 567 Words, 3,445 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25642/45-22.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Colorado ( 78.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-00725-RPM

Document 45-22

Filed 07/21/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00725-RPM

Document 45-22

Filed 07/21/2005

Page 2 of 3

l

i

LEwIs BRISBo$ BISGAARD& SMiTTT rrp
ATToRNIYE AT LA lt\' I O O W A l L S T R B E TN I N T H F L O O R , E W Y O R K , N E W Y O R K l O O O J - 3 ? 0 1 , N PrioNE: 212.232,1300 | FAxt 212.232.13gg WEBsrr!; v/ww.lbbslaw.com J

TrrgMAsM.SaNlonD DFrcT DtALr (212)32-1309 BMA[-: [email protected]

AWil2I,2004

Ftr,BNO. 26457.81

(303)291_2400 vIA FACSTMILE AND IINST CLASSII{AJL LeonardH. MaoPhee, Esq. PerkimCoie 1899 \ryFkoopStret Suite700 Deaver, 80202-1043 CO Rq Westchestr Instxarce Fire Cobpany poliov Mauagemenl Ploteotion lDsurarco Iosured: TheQuiao's Corporation Policies: DON648451 ClaieNo.i X390L9630918
Mattq; l, Sebestq Schade\ et al, (t.B,,S?besta v, Action \ 2, TheQutua's Corporationt. Fagan,et al. (the*Dtsse ters' Action') 3. Nickenony. TheQ izno's Corporation,a cl. (the,,Nicke6on Action'\

Dear l*nl

Th-swill actrnowledge receipt.ofyouconesporrderco ofAplil 15,2004,whichadvised, _aTPC.3111ltlg8_,&aJcohsisteut youl correspoDd ofMar& 31,2OO4 with e\aa ar.dvoicemail o_r Apnl z, 2{04, thatthe parties haveagr.edto engatcin mediati in theNickenohactio,r. on you naverntomled thalACEis itrvited partioi?ate the us to in llediatio& scheduled Aprit 22, for io D,etrv,er, Colorado, requested beinformed and to wtrether eCE desLs io-pnt"ipot" io ]10e, '
lne medrahoh Thi$ i$ to iDfortr yo! lhat fudher to our collespondenoo ofApdl 5, 2004, a.$ woll ar Fior correqoldence from counselto We6tchestdFire ksurance Corapany(.,W"*"h""to") "od it,
,

All oapitalizdtermsnsedherei! 6hallhavethe dfitritiors ascribed thI! the to in cqtioned policy, unlessotherwise8leoified"
SrNti^Nctsco SaN[mr!

2t3150.t800

4rs,3612580

619,2t3.1{jo6

col'f MESA sltrBE8xlrono 714,5!3.9200 909.38?.ll3o

s,1e,rJ!{6|Io 916,t64t00

]Eq,Yorx 272.232.1tD

t rsvEars 10t346g2t2

{8','|4'-2384,r

Case 1:04-cv-00725-RPM

Document 45-22

Filed 07/21/2005

Page 3 of 3

LEWis BRISBoIS BISGAAR! Sfrrrr ur & Leouard MacPheg H. Esq. Aprii 21,2004 Page2 claimsadidnistrator, USA C'ACB')outlirjogWestchster's ACE covorag position respect in of tbe captioded maf.rs, Wstchestet trot b palticipating the mediation the M&ersor wiU in of ,4cror-asthe.Policy does respond proyidgcoverage le.spect liability ineEtedby not to with to .l[sureds relatug to madequate paid consideratiou to shaeholders theirholdirysir euizno,s fo! ('Quizno's"). Accordingly, Corpontion whileQuizno,s seek settletlle N:(;ke$on rnay to Actiot, it shouldunderstatrd iE doing so,thereis lo coverage that aforded for suchLossutrdef, the ' note,separa'lely, thatyoudisagreo gercrally req eotofwostchester,s iB position . We-also regadhg the applicability Bxclusio!A{1) of policy No. DON c21635662002 reipectof of in lheNicLerron Actionasllore flrlyset torthi! our eolrespoadenco ofMarclr le ?004. fu you havemt prowided further a[y basis yourdisagreementrespeot for b positioE ofvy'estchostey's as to thr pdicability of ExclusiooA(l), Westchester confiImsits positionin tespeot ihe of applicability sucherclusion. of Wo trustyou!trderstand petrdillg tiat ftrther devlopments, andWestcho$r ACE EuEr contio[eto reselve rigbtsanddefelses all urdertle polioy,whgther lot speciffcaly or refened to hexei4that!.ay beavailable tllemuder tlo polioy,atlawor otherwise. to

i-l

LSWISBRISBOIS BISGAARD SMITHLLP &
TIyIS;map cc: KeuethD. Mlbauer

185t-9r4'J3.4,,1