Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:04-cv-01067-MSK-CBS

Document 212

Filed 12/19/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

04-cv-1067-REB-CBS

WILLIAM R. CADORNA, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant.

UNOPPOSED MOTION BY PLAINTIFF FOR ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF MOTION F RA T R E ' F E A DC S S O T O N YS E S N O T

Pa t Wia R C d ra( lni ) lni l m . a on " a t "hereby moves without opposition for if l f i P if f additional extension, from Friday, December 22, 2006, to Wednesday, January 10, 2007, of the deadline for filing of Pa t 'Mot nfr t re 'F e a dC s . As lnis i o At n y e s n o t if f o o s s grounds for this Unopposed Motion, Plaintiff states: 1. In compliance with D.C. COLO.LCivR. 7.1(A), the undersigned certifies

that h c n u e wt D fn a t o td c u s l e o s l d i ee d n' us e o n e concerning the subject of this t h s i motion, and ta D fn a t o td c u s l u ec uto s a re t teproposed h t ee d n' us e o n e q i o r u l ge d o h s i t e y extension.

1

Case 1:04-cv-01067-MSK-CBS

Document 212

Filed 12/19/2006

Page 2 of 3

2.

On December 6, 2006, Plaintiff requested and was granted an extension

t D c mb r 2 2 0 o ted a lefri gh Moi fr t re 'F e a d o e e e 2 , 0 6 fh e dn o fn i t n o At n y e s n i l i s o o s Costs. 3. The fee expert retained by Plaintiff is a leading civil rights attorney in the

Denver area with a very heavy litigation schedule. 4. Friday, lnis e e p ri ome teu d ri e ta i in t e Pa t 'fe x et fr d h n es n d h t wl o b if f n g t l

possible for him to complete his review of documents related to the case and complete h af a ins p ot f lnis t nfr t re 'F e a dC s u tatr i f v i u p ro Pa t 'Moi o At n y e s n o t ni f s i t d if f o o s s l e Christmas. 5. B c u eo c nlt i te rs e teh la sh d l , lni'fe e a s f o f sn h i e p cv od y c e u s Pa t s e i c r i i e if f

expert and the undersigned will not be able to coord aec mp t no tee p rs e i t o l i fh x et fe n eo ' af a i n s b si o Pa t 'Moi fr t re 'F e a dC s u tte f v a d u mi o f lnis t n o At n y e s n o t nih i t d sn if f o o s s l week following January 3, 2007. The requested extension is the minimum required to permit them to do so. 6. Defendant will not be prejudiced by the brief extension requested, since it

wl n d l tep y n o teu d ri e 'fe . io l e y h a me t fh n es n d e s l y a g s WHEREFORE, good cause having been shown, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this honorable Court grant an additional extension, from Friday, December 22, 2 0 ,oWe n s a , a u r 1 , 0 7 o ted a lefri go Pa t 'Moi fr 06t d e d y J n ay 0 2 0 , fh e dn o fn f lnis t n o i l i if f o Atre 'F e a dC s . t n y e s n ot o s s

2

Case 1:04-cv-01067-MSK-CBS

Document 212

Filed 12/19/2006

Page 3 of 3

DATED this 19th day of December, 2006.

Respectfully submitted, /S/

Mark E. Brennan

Mark E. Brennan, P.C. P.O. Box 2556 Centennial, CO. 80161-2556 (303) 552-9394 (office) (303) 797-7687 (cell) [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE In compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 6.1(D), the undersigned hereby certifies that, on this 19th day of December, 2006, he served a copy of the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Extension on the following person(s) via electronic mail:
Mr. William R. Cadorna 5503 S. Moore Street Littleton, CO. 80127 [email protected] Christopher Lujan, Esq. 210 W. Colfax, Dept 1108 Denver, CO. 80202 [email protected] Richard Barkley, Esq. th 410 17 St., No. 2200 Denver, CO. 80202 [email protected]

/S/

Mark E. Brennan

3