Free Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 8.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 282 Words, 1,769 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25741/91.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Colorado ( 8.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-01071-MSK

Document 91

Filed 01/18/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge John L. Kane Civil Action No. 04-cv-1071-AP SAN LUIS VALLEY ECOSYSTEM COUNSEL, NANCY ALBRIGHT, JAMES MARTIN, JERRE GUTHALS, STEVE LEWIS, ANTLERS RIO GRANDE LODGE, INC., a Colorado corporation, and CHARLES C. POWERS, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendant, and ALXCHNG, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, CNXCHNG, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, and RIO OXBOW RANCH, INC., a Colorado corporation, Intervenors.

MINUTE ORDER Judge John L. Kane ORDERS Plaintiffs'Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 89) of Minute Order Striking Plaintiffs Affidavits [sic] (Doc. 87) is GRANTED to the extent Plaintiffs interpret the Minute Order as having stricken the affidavits, rather than the " Notice"to which they were attached. It did not. In any event, Plaintiffs'shall have until February 1, 2006 to comply with Local Rule 7.1A and file a Motion to Supplement the Record with the subject affidavits, which the Court understands are directed to the issue of standing. The Defendant and Intervenors shall have until February 17, 2006 to file any response to the Motion to Supplement. Further briefing on the merits of this appeal is stayed pending resolution of the instant motion. For whatever it is worth, the Court notes the dispute over the subject affidavits appears to be much ado about nothing, and it is anticipated the

Case 1:04-cv-01071-MSK

Document 91

Filed 01/18/2006

Page 2 of 2

parties can resolve the issue in a good faith attempt at compliance under Rule 7.1A. Any further filings on the issue should include stipulated dates for briefing on the merits of the appeal.

Dated: January 18, 2006