Free Objections - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 62.2 kB
Pages: 4
Date: September 14, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 418 Words, 3,139 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/7440/235.pdf

Download Objections - District Court of Colorado ( 62.2 kB)


Preview Objections - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:01-cv-00413-JLK-BNB

Document 235

Filed 09/14/2007

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 01-cv-00413-JLK-BNB M.D. MARK, INC., Plaintiff, v. KERR-McGEE CORPORATION and ORYX ENERGY COMPANY, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS OF THOMAS A. RUSSELL ______________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff M.D. Mark, Inc. hereby submits its objections and counter-designations to Defendants' Deposition Designations. Counter-designations are based upon the deposition designations submitted by the Defendant. Plaintiff reserves the right to revise its counterdesignations, based upon the determinations made regarding Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Designations. Moreover, Thomas Russell's testimony violates the Parole Evidence Rule, as follows: I. Deposition of Thomas A. Russell A. PAGE 2627 5354 5657 5758 Objections LINE 220 37 2015 2010 OBJECTION Lack of personal knowledge; speculation; relevance; parol evidence Foundation-Lack of personal knowledge; speculation; relevance; parol evidence. Foundation-Lack of personal knowledge; speculation; relevance; parol evidence. Foundation-Lack of personal knowledge; speculation; relevance; parol evidence

Case 1:01-cv-00413-JLK-BNB

Document 235

Filed 09/14/2007

Page 2 of 4

5859 62 64 6668 6972 75 7778 8586 87

189 19-23 4-25 2117 2513 16-20 52 1116 2-16

Foundation-Lack of personal knowledge. Relevance and non-responsive answer. Relevance. Relevance. Defendants have stipulated that the PGI data is a trade secret. Relevance. Relevance Relevance, inadmissible opinions. Leading; lack of personal knowledge; speculation; parol evidence. Leading; relevance; speculation; parol evidence.

COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS PAGE 1011 11 1113 15 16 1617 1920 23 31 4142 45 4648 4950 54 60 60 2 LINE 161 6-7 19-21 5-17 9-13 2-10 248 1213 13-23 12-15 2224 11-25 44 17-16 8-25 7-8 12-13

Case 1:01-cv-00413-JLK-BNB

Document 235

Filed 09/14/2007

Page 3 of 4

6061 63 65 6566 68 6869 7275 86 8990 9193 DATED: September 14, 2007.

1812 5-12 13-16 21-20 18-19 2524 1415 17-22 23-21 2314

Respectfully submitted, PELZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

s/ Harlan P. Pelz Harlan P. Pelz Daniele W. Bonifazi 1873 South Bellaire Street, Suite 1401 Denver, CO 80222 Telephone: 303-691-5600 Facsimile: 303-691-5606 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

3

Case 1:01-cv-00413-JLK-BNB

Document 235

Filed 09/14/2007

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 14th day of September, 2007, a true and correct copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS OF THOMAS A. RUSSELL was faxed and placed in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: M. Antonio Gallegos, Esq. Scott S. Barker, Esq. Gregory E. Goldberg, Esq. HOLLAND & HART, LLP 555 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3200 Post Office Box 8749 Denver, CO 80201-8749 303-295-8261 Fax

s/ Allison E. Goldstein_____ Allison E. Goldstein

4