Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 11.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 280 Words, 1,787 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/8821/443.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Colorado ( 11.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:01-cv-01807-MSK-MJW

Document 443

Filed 07/24/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 01-cv-01807-MSK-MJW BANK ONE, N.A. (successor to Bank One, Colorado, N.A.), and BANK ONE TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Trustee of the Dora Lucille Jamison Trust and the Jamison Family Trust, Plaintiffs, v. C.V.Y. CORPORATION, d/b/a Your Valet Cleaners, and JOHNNY ON THE SPOT, INC., Defendants.

BOULDER CLEANERS, INC., and JOHN' CLEANERS, INC., S Cross-Plaintiffs, v. C.V.Y. CORPORATION, d/b/a Your Valet Cleaners, Cross-Defendant.

C.V.Y. CORPORATION, d/b/a Your Valet Cleaners, Counterclaimant, v. BANK ONE, N.A. (Successor to Bank One, Colorado, N.A.) and BANK ONE TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Trustee of the Dora Lucille Jamison Trust and the Jamison Family Trust, Counterclaim Defendants.

Case 1:01-cv-01807-MSK-MJW

Document 443

Filed 07/24/2006

Page 2 of 2

__________________________________________________________________________ ORDER DENYING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PENDING MOTIONS __________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Pending Motions (#442). The Plaintiff has not complied with applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Local Rules of Practice dated April 15, 2002, specifically, D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(D), IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Pending Motions (#442) is DENIED, without prejudice. Dated this 24th day of July, 2006. BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge