Free Order - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 40.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: August 8, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 360 Words, 2,213 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13047/275.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Federal Claims ( 40.2 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00483-LMB

Document 275

Filed 08/08/2007

Page 1 of 1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
Case No. 98-483C (Filed: August 8, 2007) ***************************************************** FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * Defendant. * ***************************************************** ORDER On July 23, 2007, the Clerk's office received a second motion to intervene in this case by Mr. William Peterson, who asserts an interest in processing spent nuclear fuel. (This motion is similar to the motion to intervene that Mr. Peterson filed on April 19, 2007, and this Court denied on May 3.) The clerk's office forwarded the submission to chambers for disposition because it did not comport with the court's filing rules. Mr. Peterson has submitted similar motions in at least 17 spent-nuclear-fuel cases currently or formerly pending before the United States Court of Federal Claims. None of the motions has been granted. Some have already been returned unfiled for failure to comport with filing standards and because Mr. Peterson failed to show good cause as to the timeliness of his application pursuant to RCFC 24. See e.g. Boston Edison Co. v. United States, No. 99-447C (Fed. Cl.); PSEG Nuclear, L.L.C. v. United States, No. 01-551C (Fed. Cl.). Others have been rejected because final judgment or an order dismissing the case at the plaintiff's or the parties' request had already been entered in the particular case. See e.g. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United States, No. 98-621C (Fed. Cl.). Mr. Peterson has not shown good cause in his motion why any application by him for intervention would be timely within the meaning of Rule 24 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The submission also fails to comply with the court's rules for serving and filing pleadings and other papers, see e.g., RCFC 5, 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3. The Clerk of the Court shall return the Filings to Mr. Peterson. A paper copy of this order shall be provided to him in the package returning the Filings. No further filings of this nature shall be accepted from Mr. Peterson. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Lawrence M. Baskir LAWRENCE M. BASKIR Judge