Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 27.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 2, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 396 Words, 2,551 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13047/261.pdf

Download Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims ( 27.1 kB)


Preview Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00483-LMB

Document 261

Filed 02/02/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS (Electronically Filed on February 2, 2006) __________________________________________ ) FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)

No. 98-483C (Judge Baskir)

PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Florida Power & Light Company ("FPL"), through the undersigned counsel, respectfully files this short reply in support of its January 3, 2006 Motion For Leave To File Its Amended And Supplemental Complaint. On January 19, 2006, Defendant (the "Government") filed a response to FPL's motion for leave, which response stated that the Government does not oppose FPL's motion. 1 Defendant's Response To Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File Its Amended And Supplemental Complaint at 2. For that reason, and for the reasons stated in FPL's January 3, 2006 motion, the Court should grant FPL leave to file its amended and supplemental complaint (which pleading was attached as Exhibit A to its motion for leave). Additionally, consistent with the parties' December 16, 2005 Joint Status Report, FPL respectfully requests the opportunity for the parties to file a joint status report outlining their

Although the parties continue to disagree about the effect of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United States, 422 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005) on the recoverability of post-complaint damages in this case, the Court need not resolve that issue at this time because the parties have agreed that November 30, 2005 is an acceptable "cutoff" date for FPL's damages claim in the instant action.

1

400314172v1

Case 1:98-cv-00483-LMB

Document 261

Filed 02/02/2006

Page 2 of 2

proposal for further proceedings in this case within 30 days after the Court rules on FPL's motion for leave to file its amended and supplemental complaint.

Dated: February 2, 2006 Of Counsel: Jay E. Silberg Daniel S. Herzfeld Jack Y. Chu PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 2300 N Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037-1128 (202) 663-8000 (202) 663-8007 (fax)

Respectfully submitted, s/ Alex D. Tomaszczuk by s/ Jack Y. Chu Alex D. Tomaszczuk PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 1650 Tysons Boulevard McLean, Virginia 22102-4859 (703) 770-7940 (703) 770-7901 (fax) Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Florida Power & Light Company

2
400314172v1