Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 856-8

Filed 09/03/2004

Page 1 of 7

EXHIBIT

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 856-8

Filed 09/03/2004

EXHIBIT
1fN'

Page 2 of 7

JL~/

if- )..-Jf-cJ
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY (98- 126C) (Merow , S.

CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMP ANY (98- 154C) (Merow , S.1. MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY (98- 474C) (Merow , S.1. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
(98- 483C) (Wilson , J. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY (98- 484C) (Wiese, J. DUKE POWER, A Division of DUKE ENERGY CORP. (98- 485C) (Sypolt, J. INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY (98- 486C) (Hodges , J. SACRAMENTO MUNICIP AL UTILITY DISTRICT (98- 488C) (Yock, S.
SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY,

et aI

(98- 614C) (Merow , S. COMMONWEALTH EDISON CaMP ANY (98- 621C) (Hewitt, J. BOSTON EDISON COMPANY (99-447C) (Allegra, J. GPU NUCLEAR, INCORPORATED (00-440C) (Bush , J. WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (00- 697C) (Merow , S. POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (00- 703C) (Damich , J. OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT (01- 115C) (Bush, J. NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT (01- 116C) (Sypolt, J. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (01- 249C) (Brogginle, J.

Plaintiffs,

THE UNITED STATES
Defendant.

Discovery Judge:
(Judge Sypolt)

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 856-8

Filed 09/03/2004

Page 3 of 7

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that , pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of
Federal Claims and the Order of the Discovery Judge dated March 25, 2002 , counsel for the

above-referenced Utility Plaintiffs will take the deposition of Defendant' s designated

representative at 9:30 a. m. on Wednesday, April 24 , 2002 , at the law offices of Jenner & Block

601 Thirteenth St., NW , Suite 1200 South , Washington , DC 20005. The deposition will be
recorded by stenographic means and will continue day to day until completed.
Defendant' s designated representative will be examined with respect to the matters set

forth in the attached exhibit.

Dated: April 18, 2002

Respectfully submitted,

Alex D. Tomaszcm
SHA W

~?-.I

;f~

PIlTMAN LLP
\\ij

1650 Tysons Boulevard McLean , VA 22102-4859 Telephone: 703. 770. 7940
Fax: 703. 770. 7901

Counsel of Record for Plaintiffs Florida Power & Light Company, Northern States Power Company, Duke Power, Indiana Michigan
Power Company, Boston Edison Company, GPU Nuclear, Inc. , Power Authority of the State of New

York , Omaha Public Power District, and Nebraska Public Power District
OF COUNSEL: Jay E. Silberg Devon E. Hewitt '
Daniel S. Herzfeld

Jack Y. Chu SHAW PITTMAN LLP 2300 N Street, N. Washington , DC 20037- 1128

~ (;~~~j ( ! '~..~.
(~'

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 856-8

Filed 09/03/2004

Page 4 of 7

M. Stanfi d Blanton

Balch & ingham , LLP
1710 Sixth Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 Tel: (205) 251- 8100 Counsel of Record for Plaintiff: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, et al.

#Z(

rLW
Richard C. Johnson Jenner & Block

c,

;,J
N.

601 13th

Street ,

Suite 1200 South Washington, D. C. 20005 Tel: (202) 639- 6075 Counsel of Record for Plaintiff: Commonwealth Edison Company
1 /

Richard W. Oehler

(J

/!J.::J-c;:

Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue , 40th Floor Seattle, W A 98101- 3099 Tel: (206) 583- 8419 Counsel of Record for Plaintiff: Wisconsin Electric Power Company

1;1

Melvin C. Garbow

Arnold & Porter :----/
555 lth Street , N. Washington , D. C. 20004- 1206 Tel: (202) 942- 5666 Counsel of Record for Plaintiff: Sacramento Municipal Utility District

~ ~~' ~

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 856-8

Filed 09/03/2004

Page 5 of 7

!u, Peter K. Shea
Office of General Counsel
Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, TN 37902- 1401 Tel: (865) 632- 7319 Counsel of Record for Plaintiff: Tennessee Valley Authority

~J/

\'i3

i(i;

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 856-8

Filed 09/03/2004

Page 6 of 7

EXHIBIT
3. DOE' s responses to DCS forms submitted by the utility plaintiffs , including DOE' s decision to stop approving such DCS forms.

5. DOE' s consideration of its obligation to accept Greater- Than- Class- C waste.

7. The date

that DOE currently believes that it will begin accepting fuel under the Standard Contract and the acceptance rate that DOE is planning to use once acceptance begins.

9. The

role and purpose of the provision on priority for shutdown reactors in the performance of

the Standard Contract.

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 856-8

Filed 09/03/2004

Page 7 of 7