Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 17.4 kB
Pages: 4
Date: August 12, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 820 Words, 5,082 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/1797/130.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 17.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:02-cv-01894-EJD

Document 130

Filed 08/12/2008

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 02-1894C (Chief Judge Damich)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, respectfully requests that the Court grant defendant an additional 15 days, to and including Friday, August 29, 2008, to file its reply to plaintiff's response to the Government's motion for joinder of Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC or, in the alternative, binding notice pursuant to RCFC 14(b) and the Contract Settlement Act, 41 U.S.C. § 114(b). The Government's reply is currently due on Thursday, August 14, 2008.1 Counsel for plaintiff has represented that plaintiff, Consumers Energy Company ("Consumers"), does not oppose this motion. First, Stephen Finn, the attorney who has been assisting counsel for the Government, is on previously scheduled leave for two weeks and thus will be unable to assist in completing the

The Government received a copy of Consumers' response brief through the Court's ECF notification system on July 31, 2008. We understand that our reply is due seven business days after the date plaintiff filed its response brief, July 31, 2008, with an additional three business days added pursuant to RCFC 6(e) because of the manner of service. Accordingly, we have calculated the due date as August 14, 2008. However, the PACER system does not currently show plaintiff's response brief on the docket and, therefore, does not indicate the due date for the Government's reply brief. Regardless, the Government has been served with a copy of the plaintiff's response brief, and we are seeking an enlargement of time to Friday, August 29, 2008.

1/

Case 1:02-cv-01894-EJD

Document 130

Filed 08/12/2008

Page 2 of 4

preparation of the reply by the current due date. Further, following the filing of Consumers' response brief on July 31, 2008, Mr. Finn needed to expend a substantial amount of time preparing for and conducting the depositions of two fact witnesses in this case, held August 5, 2008, including time for travel to Connecticut. Second, undersigned counsel will be traveling to Michigan on Wednesday and Thursday, August 13, and 14, 2008, to participate in a site inspection, and will not be able to work on the reply brief. Further, following the filing of Consumers' response brief on July 31, 2008, counsel expended significant time preparing for and participating in a pre-trial motions hearing before this Court in another spent nuclear fuel case, Energy Northwest v. United States, No. 04-0010C, held August 5, 2008. Finally, counsel is currently preparing a reply to Consumers' response to the Government's motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff's claims for interest and attorney and expert fees, filed August 4, 2008. The Government's reply brief is due on August 21, 2008. Third, the Government requires time to evaluate the effect, if any, on this matter of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decisions in Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United States, Nos. 2007-5025, -5031 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2008), Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. United States, No. 2007-5046 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2008), and Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States, Nos. 2007-5052, -5097 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2008). For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that the Court grant this motion for an enlargement of time of 15days, to and including Friday, August 29, 2008, within which to file a reply to plaintiff's response to the Government's motion for joinder of Entergy Nuclear

2

Case 1:02-cv-01894-EJD

Document 130

Filed 08/12/2008

Page 3 of 4

Palisades, LLC or, in the alternative, binding notice pursuant to RCFC 14(b) and the Contract Settlement Act, 41 U.S.C. § 114(b). Respectfully submitted, GREGORY G. KATSAS Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director

OF COUNSEL JANE K. TAYLOR Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 STEPHEN FINN Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530

s/Harold D. Lester, Jr. HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. Assistant Director

s/Scott R. Damelin SCOTT R. DAMELIN Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 305-2312 Fax: (202) 307-2503 Attorneys for Defendant

August 12, 2008

Case 1:02-cv-01894-EJD

Document 130

Filed 08/12/2008

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 12th of August, 2008, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/Scott R. Damelin

4