Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 372.7 kB
Pages: 5
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,283 Words, 6,925 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19470/25-19.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Federal Claims ( 372.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00183-NBF

Document 25-19

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 1 of 5

ATTACHMENT 18

Case 1:05-cv-00183-NBF

Document 25-19

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 2 of 5
Page
14of

SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC.

Lavery, Betty J (DSCC)
From: Takacs, Ed [[email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:08 AM

To: Cc:

Lavery, Betty J (DSCC) Hartman, Jim; Stephens, Guy D.

Subject: RE: SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC. Good Morning Betty: Sep.14, Parts were rejected Sep. 20, CAR was presented to Mr. Oh Sep. 23, Revised CAR presented to Mr. Oh. Sep 27, - Oct 1, Met with Mr. Oh and gave him the calibration check off list. ( don't know the day ) Oct.4, Met with Mr. Oh. Oct 5, Presented New CAR to Mr. Oh. Oct. 7, Called Mr. Oh. Oct. 12, Scheduled to meet with Mr. Oh on Oct 13 Oct. 12, Contract Canceled Oct 13, Mr. Oh called and asked for extension to answer CAR.

Whenever I issue a CAR, I give the contractor 10 working days to answer it or ask for an extension. In this case, I would not inspect these parts until he fixed his calibration system. In this contract, Control of inspection, measuring and test equipment is part of the contract. The parts were initially rejected by me because they would not accept the contractors Go Thread Gage. I know that Euclid Machine has other contracts and if the parts are acceptable, then I accept them. I think that I provide timely responses to my contractors. I have a cronological order of events that I keep whenever this contractor calls. If you want it, I will sent
it to you.

Ed. Takacs From: Lavery, Betty J (DSCC) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thu 10/14/2004 12:11 PM To: Takacs, Ed Subject: RE: SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC.
Ed:

I need to clear up a few issues. When was the CAR issued to Euclid and for what? How long did Euclid have to answer the CAR?
this action.

I know you have to review the correction action that Euclid has recommended and either approve or disapprove

Was Euclid able to submit orders for source inspection prior to DCMA's OAR approving Euclid's correction

actions. How does this work?
ED - 7 OCT 04 - SCHOOL - 8 OCT 04 - ON LEAVE

10/15/2004

Case 1:05-cv-00183-NBF

Document 25-19

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 3 of 5
Page 2

SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC.

Please advise.
Betty J. Lavery

Contracting Officer DSCC-PAMC COM. (614) 692-2947, DSN 650-294/ FAX (614) 693-1525 EMAIL: [email protected] Original Message From: Takacs, Ed [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 5:02 PM To: Lavery, Betty J (DSCC) Cc: Stephens, Guy D.; Hartman, Jim Subject: RE: SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC. Hi Betty: Not specifically, but he did imply. I would not look at parts until the corrective action is complied with. Is he even ready right now? That I don't know. He did request this morn ing for more time to attend to other more pressing
needs.

Ed. Takacs

From: Lavery, Betty J (DSCC) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wed 10/13/2004 3:54 PM To: Takacs, Ed Subject: RE: SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC. Ed: When he called you on October 12, at 8:30, did he request GSI on this award? Please advise.

Betty J. Lavery Contracting Officer DSCC-PAMC COM. (614) 692-2947, DSN 850-2947 FAX (614) 693-1525 EMAIL: [email protected] Original Message From: Takacs, Ed [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:43 PM To: Lavery, Betty 3 (DSCC) Cc: Stephens, Guy D.; Hartman, Jim Subject: RE: 5P0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC. Hi Betty: Mr. Oh called my Team Chief on Oct. 7, because I was in class at Bratenahl. I called him back and the main reason he called was to · et clarification about the CAR that I. had · resented to i i over his calibration s stem. He or me. He b · able to come in to serform S on the .arts he had rea also wanted me to tell him when I wo did not tell me any specific number. We mostly alked about e CAR. I told him th t I wo Id call him on Tuesday Oct 12 when 1 ret rn d to work a I was in class a d w oin to take rida ff. When we did talk on Tuesday, I scheduled to visit his ity on Oct. 13 at 9 AM. He called me at 8:30 AM if that means anything. If you need to

10/15/2004

Case 1:05-cv-00183-NBF

Document 25-19

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 4 of 5
Page 3 of 4

SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC.

talk to me, my phone # is (440) 918-9014. Ed. Takacs

From: Lavery, Betty J (DSCC) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wed 10/13/2004 2:51 PM

To: Takacs, Ed; Cornett, Dennis Subject: FW: SP0750 - 04 - M - 9839, NSN 2530 - 00 - 832 - 5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC. Ed and Dennis: Has Kaeper Machine or Euclid Machine requested source inspection on this order? If so, when and how many. Please advise as soon as possible.

Betty J. Lavery Contracting Officer DSCC-PAMC COW (614) 692-2947, DSN 850-2947 FAX (614) 693-1525 EMAIL: [email protected] Original Message From: Roffe, Robert [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:36 PM To: Lavery, Betty 3 (DSCC); Freeze, Kenneth D.; Broerman, Sandra B.; Church, Douglas J.; Haschak, Steve Cc: McKee, Susan E (DSCC) Subject: RE: SP0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC. Betty, Kaeper Machine, has not contacted me for this order. I have a delegation for a OAR to do the inspection at Euclid Machine. His name is Ed Takas, I'm on leave and do not have his phone number however you may look him up in gobal. I know he has issued a couple of corrective actions to Euclid Machine for this order. To the best of my knowledge, they Euclid claim to have 40 pcs ready of 146, however in my opinion the rest of the 146 or 100 have not been product and may not be ready till Nov or Dec.
Robert OAR for Kaeper

From: Lavery, Betty J (DSCC) [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Wed 10/13/2004 1:10 PM To: Freeze, Kenneth D.; Broerman, Sandra B.; Roffe, Robert; Church, Douglas J.; Haschak, Steve Cc: McKee, Susan E (DSCC) Subject: 5P0750-04-M-9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC. DSCC legal department received a call this morning regarding my cancellation. The order was due on October 11, 2004, which was a holiday . Therefore, Kaeper could not submit the order for source inspection. It was my understanding that Kaeper Machine did not request source inspection on the above order due to a CAR

10/15/2004

Case 1:05-cv-00183-NBF

Document 25-19

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 5 of 5
Pave 4 014

SP0750 - 04 - M - 9839, NSN 2530-00-832-5258, KAEPER MACHINE INC.

with Mr. Oh at Euclid. Therefore, I withdrew the order.

Please let me know if anyone received a request for source inspection on this order and when it was received. Thanks! Betty J. Lavery Contracting Officer DSCC-PAMC COM. (614) 692-2947, DSN 850-2947 FAX (614) 693-1525 EMAIL: [email protected]

I 0/ 1 5/2004

4