Free Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 41.6 kB
Pages: 7
Date: March 31, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,241 Words, 8,021 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19768/39.pdf

Download Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Federal Claims ( 41.6 kB)


Preview Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL

Document 39

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ALI JAZMIN RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 05-370C (Judge Lettow)

DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT For its answer to the complaint, defendant admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1. The allegations contained in paragraph 1 constitute conclusions of law and

plaintiff's characterizations of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 2. The allegations contained in paragraph 2 constitute conclusions of law and

plaintiff's characterizations of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 3. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 3 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 4. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 4 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 5. Admits that the United States is the defendant in this action. The remaining

allegations contained in paragraph 5 constitute conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterizations of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 6. The allegations contained in paragraph 6 constitute plaintiff's characterizations of

Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL

Document 39

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 2 of 7

her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 7. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 7 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 8. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 8 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 9. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 9 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 10. 11. Admits. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 11 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 12. 13. 14. 15. Admits. Admits. Admits. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 15 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 16. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 16 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 17. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 17 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 18. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 18 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 2

Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL

Document 39

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 3 of 7

19.

Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 19 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 20. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 20, except admits that the search by

the United States and its agents of the subject vehicle prior to the sale did not reveal the presence of marijuana or any other illegal substance. 21. The allegations contained in paragraph 21 constitute conclusions of law and

plaintiff's characterizations of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 22. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 22. The

allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 22 constitute conclusions of law, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 23. 24. 25. Admits. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 25 constitute conclusions of law and

plaintiff's characterizations of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, admits that the United States and its agents had exclusive control of the vehicle after the seizure and before the auction sale and otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 25. 26. 27. 28. Denies. Denies. The allegations contained in paragraph 28 constitute conclusions of law, to which 3

Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL

Document 39

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 4 of 7

no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 29. 30. 31. Denies. Denies. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 31, except admits that Adrian

Rodriguez was arrested and imprisoned by Mexican authorities until his release on or about August 14, 2003. 32. The allegations contained in paragraph 32 constitute conclusions of law and

plaintiff's characterization of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 33. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 33. Denies the

allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 33, and avers that the agreement between the parties is reflected in several written documents. 34. The allegations contained in paragraph 34 constitute conclusions of law, to which

no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 40, except admits that Adrian

Rodriguez was imprisoned in Mexico until approximately August 14, 2003. 41. The allegations contained in paragraph 41 constitute conclusions of law and 4

Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL

Document 39

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 5 of 7

plaintiff's characterization of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 42. Admits the allegation contained in the first sentence of paragraph 42. Denies the

allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 42, and avers that the agreement between the parties is reflected in several written documents. 43. The allegations contained in paragraph 43 constitute conclusions of law to which

no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 49, except admits that the United

States and its agents had exclusive control of the vehicle after the seizure and before the auction sale. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 55, except admits that Adrian

Rodriguez was arrested and imprisoned by Mexican authorities until his release on or about 5

Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL

Document 39

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 6 of 7

August 14, 2003. 56. The allegations contained in paragraph 56 constitute conclusions of law and

plaintiff's characterization of her case, to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 57. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in the "Wherefore"

paragraph that follows paragraph 56 of the complaint or any relief whatsoever. 58. Denies each and every allegation not previously admitted or otherwise qualified.

WHEREFORE, defendant requests that the Court enter judgment in its favor, order that plaintiff's amended complaint be dismissed, and grant defendant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General

DAVID M. COHEN Director

6

Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL

Document 39

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 7 of 7

s/ Kathryn A. Bleecker KATHRYN A. BLEECKER Assistant Director s/ Andrew P. Averbach ANDREW P. AVERBACH Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Washington, DC 20530 Tel. (202) 353-0527 Fax. (202) 305-2118 March 31, 2006 Attorneys for Defendant

7