Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL
Document 28
Filed 11/29/2005
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ and ALI JAZMIN RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 05-370C (Judge Lettow)
DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF DUE DATES FOR REPLY PAPERS Defendant, the United States, submits the following reply to plaintiffs' opposition to defendant's motion to strike, filed on November 8, 2005, and requests clarification of the due date for its reply to plaintiffs' opposition to our motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. On November 18, 2005, plaintiffs filed a response to our motion to strike plaintiffs' response to our dispositive motion, asserting that they had encountered various problems with the Court's electronic filing system and seeking leave to file revised pleadings. Later that day and the following day, plaintiffs filed a revised set of papers responding to our dispositive motion. As of the date of this reply, the Court has neither ruled upon our motion to strike nor granted plaintiffs leave to revise its opposition papers. As a result, it is not clear whether or when a reply to plaintiff's opposition to our dispositive motion is required. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Court designate which, if any, set of opposition papers the United States should reply to and grant the United States 14 days from the date of the Court's order to file a reply.
Case 1:05-cv-00370-CFL
Document 28
Filed 11/29/2005
Page 2 of 2
Respectfully submitted,
PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General
DAVID M. COHEN Director /s/Kathryn A. Bleecker KATHYRN A. BLEECKER Assistant Director
/s/Andrew P. Averbach ANDREW P. AVERBACH Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Washington, DC 20530 Tel. (202) 353-0527 Fax. (202) 305-2118 November 29, 2005 Attorneys for Defendant
2