Free Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Fact - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 79.1 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 801 Words, 5,113 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19902/35.pdf

Download Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Fact - District Court of Federal Claims ( 79.1 kB)


Preview Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Fact - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00503-TCW

Document 35

Filed 04/30/2007

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS HOSPITAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 05-503 T Judge Thomas C. Wheeler

PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF UNCONTROVERTED FACT IN SUPPORT OF ITS CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Rule 56(h)(2) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, Plaintiff Hospital Service Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania ("HSA") respectfully submits the following Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Fact in support of its cross-motion for partial summary judgment and in opposition to the Government's motion for summary judgment: 1. HSA's claims with respect to its section 165 losses relating to healthcare coverage

contracts were disallowed by the Internal Revenue Service, as were the claims of almost all the other similarly situated Blue Cross/Blue Shield organizations. Statutory Notices of Claim Disallowance dated April 27, 2001, for the tax years 1991 through 1997 (hereinafter "Notice of Disallowance") (Pl. Ex. 1, App. B at B-3 through B-16); Excerpts from PricewaterhouseCoopers Report (2007), "2006 Year in Review: Continuing Developments in the Taxation of Insurance Companies" (hereinafter "PWC Year in Review") (Pl. Ex. 2, App. B at B-20).

1

751367.1

Case 1:05-cv-00503-TCW

Document 35

Filed 04/30/2007

Page 2 of 4

2.

The Internal Revenue Service has proffered a national settlement to all of the Blue

Cross/Blue Shield organizations not currently in litigation for losses arising from the cancellation or termination of healthcare coverage contracts. May 12, 2006 Letter from Internal Revenue Service, LMSB Division to an unnamed Blue Cross/Blue Shield organization (hereinafter "Settlement Offer Letter") (Pl. Ex. 3, App. B at B-23 through B-26); PWC Year in Review (Pl. Ex. 2, App. B at B-20). 3. In the national settlement offer, the Government agreed that a loss deduction is

allowable upon termination of a healthcare coverage contract with respect to which the taxpayer claims a stepped-up basis as a result of the Fresh Start Basis Rule. Settlement Offer Letter (Pl. Ex. 3, App. B at B-23); Sample Form 906-c (Rev. August 1994), Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering Specific Matters, sent by the Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter "Sample Closing Agreement") (Pl. Ex. 4, App. B at B-27 through B-28); PWC Year in Review (Pl. Ex. 2, App. B at B-20). 4. In the national settlement offer, the Government will allow the Blue Cross/Blue

Shield organizations to deduct 80 percent of the appraised value of the terminated healthcare coverage contracts at issue, subject to an overall valuation limitation. Settlement Offer Letter (Pl. Ex. 3, App. B at B-23 through B-24); PWC Year in Review (Pl. Ex. 2, App. B at B-21). 5. The national settlement offer contemplates that a Closing Agreement will form

part of the settlement which will, in effect, determine the taxpayers' section 165 deductions for all future years. Settlement Offer Letter (Pl. Ex. 3, App. B at B-24 through B-25); Sample Closing Agreement (Pl. Ex. 4, App. B at B-27 through B-29); PWC Year in Review (Pl. Ex. 2, App. B at B-20 through B-21). 2
751367.1

Case 1:05-cv-00503-TCW

Document 35

Filed 04/30/2007

Page 3 of 4

6.

The settlement permanently settles the section 165 deduction issue for the parties

to the settlement. Settlement Offer Letter (Pl. Ex. 3, App. B at B-25); Sample Closing Agreement (Pl. Ex. 4, App. B at B-29). 7. In each of its taxable years beginning in 1987 HSA suffered losses when some of

its healthcare coverage contracts were cancelled or terminated. Def. Ex. 18 at 28 (Def. App. B at B-193). 8. HSA determined the individual January 1, 1987, value of each and every one of

its group healthcare coverage contracts (which range from less than $100 to more than $400,000) and claimed, under Code section 165, loss deductions for each lost contract in the year of the loss. Def. Ex. 18 at 28 (Def. App. B at B-193); Def.'s PFUF ¶¶ 9-11, 44; Excepts from App. to Ernst & Young Valuation Report (Pl. Ex. 5, App. B at B-32 through B-33); Robinson Decl. ¶ 8 (Pl. App. B at B-2). 9. HSA claims loss deductions, not depreciation deductions, for the cancellation,

abandonment or termination of its healthcare coverage contracts. Def. Ex. 18 at 28 (Def. App. B at B-193); Def.'s PFUF ¶¶ 9, 44.

3

751367.1

Case 1:05-cv-00503-TCW

Document 35

Filed 04/30/2007

Page 4 of 4

Respectfully submitted,

____/s/ Frederick H. Robinson _____ Frederick H. Robinson MILLER & CHEVALIER CHARTERED 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 626-5800 (202) 628-0858 (facsimile) Counsel of Record for Plaintiff Of Counsel: Clarence T. Kipps, Jr. Maria O. Jones Adam P. Feinberg MILLER & CHEVALIER CHARTERED 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 626-5800 (202) 628-0858 (facsimile) Dated: April 30, 2007

4

751367.1