Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 31.9 kB
Pages: 5
Date: November 4, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 751 Words, 4,533 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19954/13.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 31.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00551-LJB

Document 13

Filed 11/04/2005

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS HM2 CORPORATION, d/b/a HM2 CONSTRUCTORS AND FABRICATORS, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 05-551C (Judge Bush)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Defendant, the United States, respectfully requests the Court to grant an enlargement of time of 21 days, to and including November 28, 2005, within which to file joint preliminary status report ("JPSR"). November 7, 2005. The JPSR is due on or before

This is our first request for an enlargement Counsel for plaintiff, HM2 Corporation

of time for this purpose.

("HM2") has authorized us to state that HM2 does not oppose this motion. Because of the press of other business, counsel for the United States does not expect to have an opportunity to begin preparing the draft JPSR until after November 14, 2005. for HM2 has informed us that he is also very busy. Since filing the complaint in this case, counsel for the United States has devoted himself primarily to Air Force v. United Technol Corp., 05-1393 (Fed. Cir.), an important case with an extremely large record. In addition, in Kola Nut, et. al. v. Counsel

United States, No. 05-1027C (Fed. Cl.), a bid protest case, counsel has been required to devote several days to various

Case 1:05-cv-00551-LJB

Document 13

Filed 11/04/2005

Page 2 of 5

activities, including the expedited briefing of a motion for a preliminary injunction, and three lengthy conference calls with the Court. Furthermore, on October 25, 2005, counsel filed an

informal brief in Manares v. OPM, 05-3216 (Fed. Cir.). The full enlargement requested is needed. Work on the United Technol case is not complete. Counsel

expects to spend more than one week completing the assembly of the draft joint appendix and making revisions to the draft brief in response to comments by counsel for the agency and by supervisors at the Department of Justice. This work must be

completed by November 14, 2005 because no further enlargements in the United Technol case are permitted. On November 2, 2005, counsel is due to file an informal brief in Saintignon v. DVA, 05-7191 (Fed. Cir.). On November 9,

2005, counsel is due to present oral argument before the court of appeals in Jacobs Engineering v. United States, 05-5052 (Fed. Cir.). On November 14, 2005, counsel is due to file three formal briefs in the court of appeals: Air Force v. United Technol

Corp., 05-1393 (Fed. Cir.); Robertson v. Dept. of Treasury, 053156 (Fed. Cir.); Applied Companies v. Army, 05-0511 (Fed. Cir.). No further enlargements of time are permitted with regard to the United Technol case. The Robertson deadline has already been

enlarged by 62 days, and counsel intends to make strenuous

-2-

Case 1:05-cv-00551-LJB

Document 13

Filed 11/04/2005

Page 3 of 5

efforts to file the Government's brief in Robertson by November 14, 2005. The Government has sought an enlargement of time

within which to file the Applied Companies brief. Counsel must also devote substantial time to the Kola Nut bid protest case during November, and counsel must perform myriad smaller tasks in other cases. In addition, time will be needed to consult with agency counsel, prepare a draft statement of issues, consult with opposing counsel regarding the text of the JPSR, and respond to review by agency counsel and by supervisors within the Department of Justice. For the reasons stated above, we respectfully request that our unopposed motion for an enlargement of time be granted. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director S/ Kathryn A. Bleecker KATHRYN A. BLEECKER Assistant Director

-3-

Case 1:05-cv-00551-LJB

Document 13

Filed 11/04/2005

Page 4 of 5

S/ James W. Poirier JAMES W. POIRIER Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor, 1100 L St, N.W Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: 202-307-6289 Fax: 202-514-7969 October 31, 2005 Attorneys for Defendant

-4-

Case 1:05-cv-00551-LJB

Document 13

Filed 11/04/2005

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on November 4, 2005, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this

filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. the Court's system. S/ James W. Poirier Parties may access this filing through